Key result
Prompt coronary revascularization improved the Duke Activity Status Index by 1.32 points (P<0.001) compared with medical therapy in patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
Does prompt revascularization and/or insulin sensitization improve health status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease compared to medical therapy and/or insulin provision?
RCT (n=2,368)
Stratified by intended method of revascularization (CABG or PCI)
Does prompt revascularization and/or insulin sensitization improve health status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease compared to medical therapy and/or insulin provision?
Prompt coronary revascularization is associated with small but statistically significant improvements in health status compared with initial medical therapy among patients with diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modest health status gains support considering revascularization in diabetic patients with stable ischemic heart disease; extends RCT evidence on functional outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Health status is a key outcome for comparing treatments, particularly when mortality does not differ significantly. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) randomized 2368 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease to (1) prompt revascularization versus medical therapy and (2) insulin sensitization versus insulin provision. Randomization was stratified by the intended method of revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention. The Duke Activity Status Index and RAND Energy, Health Distress, and Self-Rated Health scales were assessed at study entry and annually thereafter; linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of randomized treatment on these measures. Health status improved significantly from baseline to 1 year (P<0.001) in each randomized treatment group. Compared with medical therapy, prompt revascularization was associated with significantly greater improvements in Duke Activity Status Index (1.32 points; P<0.001), Energy (1.36 points; P=0.02), and Self-rated Health (1.77 points; P=0.007) but not Health Distress (-0.47; P=0.46). These treatment effects were largely maintained over 4 years of follow-up. The effect of revascularization on the Duke Activity Status Index was significantly larger in the subgroup of patients intended for coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with the subgroup intended for percutaneous coronary intervention. Health status did not differ significantly on any of the 4 measures between the insulin provision and insulin sensitization strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt coronary revascularization was associated with small yet statistically significant improvements in health status compared with initial medical therapy among patients with diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00006305.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brooks et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease (n=2,368). Prompt revascularization vs. Medical therapy was evaluated on Duke Activity Status Index (MD 1.32, p=<0.001). Prompt coronary revascularization improved the Duke Activity Status Index by 1.32 points (P<0.001) compared with medical therapy in patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: