Analysis of myocardial revascularization and endpoints after a 1-year follow-up of patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease, depending on diabetes presence

Aim. To analyze myocardial revascularization in patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and with different glycemic status, as well as to evaluate complications after a 1-year follow-up. Material and methods. This prospective comparative clinical study included 202 patients of both sexes with acute and chronic coronary artery disease. Depending on the glycemic status and CAD type, the patients were divided into four groups: acute CAD and type 2 diabetes (T2D); acute CAD without T2D (control group); chronic CAD and T2D; chronic CAD without DM2 (control group). Depending on the clinical condition and the results of coronary angiography, patients underwent various types of myocardial revascularization: balloon angioplasty without stenting, stenting, coronary artery bypass grafting, stenting + coronary artery bypass grafting. One year after discharge, all patients were contacted to evaluate complications and endpoints, which included recurrent myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, readmission, revascularization, and death. Total indicator of endpoints was assessed. Results. Up to 80% of patients with acute and chronic CAD, regardless of glycemic status, underwent revascularization, mainly stenting. The prevalence of stenting among persons without T2D with acute and chronic CAD was significantly higher compared with patients with T2D. The absolute number of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, including in combination with stenting, was higher in the T2D groups. In groups without T2D, the number of patients with one stent was 2-2,5 times higher compared to groups with T2D — acute CAD (p=0,041) and chronic CAD (p=0,017). The prevalence of implantation of ≥2 stents did not differ between the groups. Within 1 year after discharge, there were more hospitalizations and reoperations among people with acute and chronic CAD and T2D. The groups did not differ in the number of non-fatal and fatal complications, although the absolute numbers of these indicators were higher in patients with T2D. The total number of endpoints in T2D people, regardless of the CAD type, were 2 times higher compared to the corresponding control groups (p<0,001). Conclusion. Most patients with acute and chronic CAD, regardless of glycemic status, underwent myocardial revascularization. In patients without T2D, stenting prevailed, most often of one coronary artery. Patients with T2D, along with stenting, underwent coronary bypass grafting, as well as a combination of these two procedures. After a year of follow-up, the number of complications in patients with T2D was 2 times higher compared to patients without type 2 diabetes, which emphasizes the importance of secondary prevention, including complex drug treatment.