Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strategies directed against activated neutrophils have reduced ischemia-induced brain injury. However, therapies targeted specially against the neutrophil adhesion protein L-selectin have not yet been examined in stroke. This study therefore examined the effects of a monoclonal antibody directed against L-selectin in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke with (n = 16) or without (n = 10) concomitant t-PA therapy. Rabbits received either the humanized monoclonal antibody DREG200 directed against the L-selectin receptor or humanized control monoclonal antibody HuDREG55 which does not bind to rabbit L-selectin in addition to t-PA therapy (n = 8, each group). HuDREG200 (2 mg kg-1 i.v.) was given as a bolus 3 h following clot embolization, followed immediately by a 2 h intravenous infusion of t-PA (6.3 mg kg-1. Without t-PA therapy rabbits received HuDREG200 (2 mgkg-1, i.v.; n = 5) or HuDREG55 (n = 5) 1 h following clot embolization. The group receiving HuDREG200 in addition to t-PA demonstrated a moderate improvement in brain infarct size (8.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 13.5 +/- 3.5, %hemisphere, mean +/- sem), ICP (final reading 10.0 +/- 1.6 vs. 12.4 +/- 3.0 torr) and restoration in regional cerebral blood flow (30.2 +/- 7.8 vs. 21.6 +/- 10.9 cc 100 g-1 min-1) when compared to t-PA therapy alone although statistical significance was not achieved. No efficacy was demonstrated in the group receiving HUDREG200 without concomitant t-PA therapy. The results suggest the addition of a humanized anti-L-selectin monoclonal antibody HuDREG200 in combination with t-PA may further improve outcome in acute thromboembolic stroke, although future studies are necessary to support these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bednar et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: