Key result
Chronic vagus nerve stimulation significantly improved cardiac output (2.9 vs 2.3 L/min) and left ventricular forward stroke volume compared to control in a canine model of chronic mitral regurgitation.
Why the study?
Does chronic vagus nerve stimulation improve left ventricular function and remodeling in a canine model of chronic mitral regurgitation?
RCT (n=12)
Randomly divided
No
Does chronic vagus nerve stimulation improve left ventricular function and remodeling in a canine model of chronic mitral regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.9% vs 2.3%
p-value: p=<0.05
Chronic vagus nerve stimulation improved left ventricular contractile function and biomarker profiles in a canine model of chronic mitral regurgitation, although it did not significantly reverse chamber remodeling.
Hypothesis-generating for vagus nerve stimulation in mitral regurgitation; leaves open human translation and remodeling effects.
BACKGROUND: Autonomic dysfunction, characterized by sympathetic activation and vagal withdrawal, contributes to the progression of heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that chronic vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) could prevent left ventricular (LV) remodeling and dysfunction in a canine HF model induced by chronic mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS AND RESULTS: After the MR inducing procedure, 12 survived canines were randomly divided into the control (n = 6) and the VNS (n = 6) groups. At month 2, a VNS stimulator system was implanted in all canines. From month 3 to month 6, VNS therapy was applied in the VNS group but not in the control group. At month 6, compared with the control group, the canines in VNS group had significantly higher cardiac output (2.3 ± 0.3 versus 2.9 ± 0.4 L/min, P < 0.05, LV forward stroke volume (20.1 ± 3.7 versus 24.8 ± 3.9 ml, P < 0.05), and end-systolic stiffness constant (2.2 ± 0.3 versus 2.7 ± 0.3, P < 0.05). NT-proBNP and C-reactive protein were decreased significantly in the VNS group. However, no statistical difference was found in LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic dimension, LV end-diastolic volume, myocyte cross-sectional area, or collagen volume fraction between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic VNS therapy may ameliorate MR-induced LV contractile dysfunction and improve the expression of biomarkers, but has less effect in improving LV chamber remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Chronic mitral regurgitation (canine model) (n=12). Chronic vagus nerve stimulation vs. Control (no VNS) was evaluated on Cardiac output at 6 months (L/min) (p=<0.05). Chronic vagus nerve stimulation significantly improved cardiac output (2.9 vs 2.3 L/min) and left ventricular forward stroke volume compared to control in a canine model of chronic mitral regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: