Key result
Short-term VNS improves LVEF by ~9% and reduces BNP in rats with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Does short-term vagal nerve stimulation improve left ventricular function and cardiac remodeling in a rat model of chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=23)
Randomized
No
Does short-term vagal nerve stimulation improve left ventricular function and cardiac remodeling in a rat model of chronic heart failure?
Short-term vagal nerve stimulation improves left ventricular function, reduces cardiac remodeling, and enhances cardiac excitation-contraction coupling in a rat model of post-MI chronic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for vagal stimulation in heart failure; leaves open translation to human trials.
Increasing numbers of animal and clinical investigations have demonstrated the effectiveness of long-term electrical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) on chronic heart failure (CHF). The present study investigated the effects of short-term VNS on the hemodynamics of cardiac remodeling and cardiac excitation-contraction coupling (ECP) in an animal model of CHF following a large myocardial infarction. At 3 weeks subsequent to ligation of the left coronary artery, the surviving rats were randomized into vagal and sham-stimulated groups. The right vagal nerve of the CHF rats was stimulated for 72 h. The vagal nerve was stimulated with rectangular pulses of 40 ms duration at 1 Hz, 5 V. The treated rats, compared with the untreated rats, had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (54.86 ± 9.73, vs. 45.60 ± 5.51%; P=0.025) and left ventricular fractional shortening (25.31 ± 6.30, vs. 15.42 ± 8.49%; P=0.013), and lower levels of brain natriuretic peptide (10.07 ± 2.63, vs. 19.95 ± 5.22 ng/ml; P=0.001). The improvement in cardiac pumping function was accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular end diastolic volume (1.11 ± 0.50, vs. 1.54 ± 0.57 cm(3); P=0.032) and left ventricular end systolic volume (0.50 ± 0.28, vs. 0.87 ± 0.36 cm(3); P=0.007). Furthermore, the expression levels of ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) and sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium adenosine triphosphatase (SERCA2) were significantly higher in the treated rats compared with the untreated rats (P=0.011 and P=0.001 for RyR2 and SERCA2, respectively). Therefore, VNS was beneficial to the CHF rats through the prevention of cardiac remodeling and improvement of cardiac ECP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (n=23). Short-term vagal nerve stimulation vs. Sham stimulation was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.025). Short-term vagal nerve stimulation for 72 hours significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (54.86% vs. 45.60%) and reduced brain natriuretic peptide levels in rats with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: