Why the study?
What variables are associated with the prescription of NOACs versus VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=1,290)
What variables are associated with the prescription of NOACs versus VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 3.36 (95% CI 1.73–6.51)
p-value: p=<.001
Prescription of NOACs versus VKAs in atrial fibrillation is influenced by both medical factors (such as prior bleeding, stroke, and renal function) and social factors (such as education level).
Supports bleeding-informed anticoagulant selection in AF; leaves open unmeasured confounding in this observational cohort.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Many patients with AF receive chronic anticoagulation, either with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to analyze variables associated with prescription of NOAC. METHODS: Patients with AF under anticoagulation treatment were prospectively recruited in this observational registry. The sample comprised 1290 patients under chronic anticoagulation for AF, 994 received VKA (77.1%) and 296 NOAC (22.9%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with use of NOAC. RESULTS: Mean age was 73.8 ± 9.4 years, and 42.5% of the patients were women. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0 in 4.9% of the population, 1 in 24.1%, and ≥2 in 71% (median = 4, interquartile range = 2). Variables associated with NOAC treatment were major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.73-6.51; P < .001), hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 3.19; CI 95% 1.00-10.15, P = .049), university education (OR = 2.44; CI 95%: 1.55-3.84; P < .001), high diastolic blood pressure (OR = 1.02; CI 95%: 1.00-1.03; P = .006), and higher glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.01, CI 95% 1.00-1.01; P = .01). And variables associated with VKA use were history of cancer (OR = 0.46; CI 95%: 0.25-0.85; P = .013) and bradyarrhythmia (OR = 0.40; CI 95% 0.19-0.85; P = .020). CONCLUSION: Medical and social variables were associated with prescription of NOAC. Major bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, university education, and higher glomerular filtration rate were more frequent among patients under NOAC. On the contrary, patients with history of cancer or bradyarrhythmias more frequently received VKA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno‐Arribas et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,290). Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Major bleeding as a predictor of NOAC prescription (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.73-6.51, p=<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: