Key result
A machine learning-based random forest model effectively predicted 3-year survival after endovascular aneurysm repair with an AUC of 0.91 and an accuracy of 81.1%.
Why the study?
Endovascular aneurysm repair is widely used for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but mid-term survival remains a concern.
Can a machine learning-based random forest model accurately predict 3-year survival in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair?
Cohort (n=169)
No
Can a machine learning-based random forest model accurately predict 3-year survival in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.91
A random forest model effectively predicts 3-year survival after EVAR, highlighting poor nutritional status, compromised immunity, and chronic kidney disease as key predictors of mortality.
PURPOSE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is widely used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), but mid-term survival remains a concern. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based random forest model to predict 3-year survival after EVAR. METHODS: A random forest model was trained using data from 176 EVAR patients, of whom 169 patients were retained for analysis, incorporating 23 preoperative and perioperative variables. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The model achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91, with an accuracy of 81.1%, a sensitivity of 81.6%, a specificity of 80.9%, and an F1 score of 0.66. Feature importance analysis identified poor nutritional status (geriatric nutritional risk index <101.4), compromised immunity (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3.19), chronic kidney disease (CKD), octogenarian status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), small aneurysm size, and statin use as the top predictors of 3-year mortality. The average values of the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score across the 5-folds were 0.76 ± 0.10, 73.9 ± 5.8%, 60.4 ± 1.9%, 77.8 ± 0.7%, and 0.59 ± 0.17, indicating consistent performance across different data subsets. CONCLUSIONS: The random forest model effectively predicts 3-year survival after EVAR, indicating key factors such as poor nutritional status, compromised immunity, CKD, octogenarian status, COPD, small aneurysm size, and statin use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishibe et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=169). Machine learning-based random forest model was evaluated on Prediction of 3-year survival (AUC 0.91). A machine learning-based random forest model effectively predicted 3-year survival after endovascular aneurysm repair with an AUC of 0.91 and an accuracy of 81.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: