Key result
Ultrasound measurement of the transverse tracheal diameter showed no significant difference compared to CT (mean difference 0.19 mm, p>0.05) and demonstrated strong correlation (r=0.849).
Why the study?
To explore the feasibility of ultrasound measurement of the transverse diameter of the cervical trachea at its narrowest point in patients undergoing severe scoliosis orthopedic surgery.
Does ultrasound measurement of tracheal diameter provide comparable accuracy to CT for guiding endotracheal tube size in patients undergoing severe scoliosis surgery?
RCT (n=110)
randomly divided
Does ultrasound measurement of tracheal diameter provide comparable accuracy to CT for guiding endotracheal tube size in patients undergoing severe scoliosis surgery?
Mean Difference: 0.19
p-value: p=>0.05
Ultrasound is a feasible, non-invasive bedside alternative to CT for measuring tracheal diameter to guide endotracheal tube selection in severe scoliosis patients.
Ultrasound matches CT for tracheal diameter; extends bedside options for endotracheal tube selection in scoliosis surgery.
Objective To explore the feasibility of ultrasound measurement of the transverse diameter of the cervical trachea at its narrowest point in patients undergoing severe scoliosis orthopedic surgery. Methods A total of 110 patients, aged 18-65, who scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery for severe scoliosis were included. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent two types of tracheal inner diameter measurements: (1) CT measurement of the anteroposterior diameter (D min,AP ) and transverse diameter (D min,T ) of the cervical trachea at its narrowest point; and (2) ultrasound measurement of D min,T . Based on the measurement results, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, the CT group ( n = 55) and the ultrasound group ( n = 55). We compared the D min,AP and D min,T measured by CT for all patients. Then, we compared CT and ultrasound measurements of D min,T . Furthermore, we conducted an analysis to determine the correlation and consistency between the two methods. Additionally, we examined the success rate of first-attempt tracheal intubation and the occurrence rate of tracheal tube being too wide or too narrow between the two groups, and assessed the occurrence of postoperative 24-h pharyngeal pain and hoarseness. Results When comparing the D min,AP and D min,T measured by CT in all patients, a statistically significant difference was observed ( p < .001). When comparing the measurements of D min,T between CT and ultrasound in all patients, no statistically significant differences were found ( p > .05). The correlation coefficient (r) between CT and ultrasound measurements of D min,T was 0.849 ( p < .001). The mean difference in D min,T was 0.19 mm, and the limits of agreement (LoA) were −2.24 mm to 2.62 mm. Conclusions Ultrasound measurement of D min,T in severe scoliosis patients is feasible and provides valuable guidance for the selection of endotracheal tube sizes. It serves as a non-invasive and bedside auxiliary examination method for perioperative airway assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in severe scoliosis (n=110). Ultrasound measurement of tracheal diameter vs. CT measurement was evaluated on Transverse diameter of the cervical trachea (D min,T) (MD 0.19 mm, p=>0.05). Ultrasound measurement of the transverse tracheal diameter showed no significant difference compared to CT (mean difference 0.19 mm, p>0.05) and demonstrated strong correlation (r=0.849).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: