Key result
The presence of heart failure in patients receiving phenprocoumon-based oral anti-coagulation was associated with lower time in therapeutic range and a worse net clinical benefit outcome (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.31-2.02; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does the presence of heart failure reduce the quality of phenprocoumon-based oral anti-coagulation therapy and worsen clinical outcomes?
Cohort (n=2,771)
Yes
Does the presence of heart failure reduce the quality of phenprocoumon-based oral anti-coagulation therapy and worsen clinical outcomes?
Heart failure is an independent risk factor for lower quality of oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon, leading to worse clinical outcomes and increased bleeding, which can be mitigated by specialized coagulation care.
Patients with heart failure (HF) are frequently anti-coagulated with vitamin K-antagonists (VKAs). The use of long-acting VKA may be preferable for HF patients due to higher stability of plasma concentrations. However, evidence on phenprocoumon-based oral anti-coagulation (OAC) therapy in HF is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the presence of HF on quality of phenprocoumon-based OAC and the subsequent clinical outcome. Quality of OAC therapy and the incidence of adverse events were analysed in a cohort of regular care (n = 2,011) from the multi-centre thrombEVAL study program (NCT01809015) stratified by the presence of HF. To assess the modifiability of outcome, results were compared with data from individuals receiving specialized care for anti-coagulation (n = 760). Overall, the sample comprised of 813 individuals with HF and 1,160 subjects without HF in the regular care cohort. Quality of OAC assessed by time in therapeutic range (TTR) was 66.1% (47.8%/82.8%) for patients with HF and 70.6% (52.1%/85.9%) for those without HF (p = 0.0046). Stratification for New York Heart Classification (NYHA)-class demonstrated a lower TTR with higher NYHA classes: TTRNYHA-I 69.6% (49.4%/85.6%), TTRNYHA-II 66.5% (50.1%/82.9%) and TTRNYHA-≥III 61.8% (43.1%/79.9%). This translated into a worse net clinical benefit outcome for HF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [1.31/2.02]; p < 0.0001) and an increased risk of bleeding (HR 1.40 [1.04/1.89]; p = 0.028). Management in a specialized coagulation service resulted in an improvement of all, TTR (∆+12.5% points), anti-coagulation-specific and non-specific outcome of HF individuals. In conclusion, HF is an independent risk factor for low quality of OAC therapy translating into an increased risk for adverse events, which can be mitigated by specialized care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Göbel et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Heart failure requiring oral anti-coagulation (n=2,771). Presence of heart failure vs. Absence of heart failure was evaluated on Net clinical benefit outcome (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.31-2.02, p=<0.0001). The presence of heart failure in patients receiving phenprocoumon-based oral anti-coagulation was associated with lower time in therapeutic range and a worse net clinical benefit outcome (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.31-2.02; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: