Key result
Bilateral vagotomy reduced APDmax and CL50 in cats with intact or partially reduced sympathetic tone (P<0.05), but had no effect when beta-adrenergic blockade was applied.
Why the study?
Does bilateral vagotomy alter the rate dependence of ventricular repolarisation in anaesthetised cats?
Population
20 anaesthetised cats divided into three groups based on background sympathetic tone
Comparison
Bilateral vagotomy vs Control conditions prior to vagotomy within each…
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Indicates indirect vagal effects on repolarization via sympathetic antagonism in cats; leaves open direct influence and clinical translation.
Does bilateral vagotomy alter the rate dependence of ventricular repolarisation in anaesthetised cats?
p-value: p=<0.05
Parasympathetic modulation of ventricular repolarisation rate dependence appears to occur indirectly via vago-sympathetic reflexes or antagonism of circulating catecholamines rather than direct parasympathetic influence.
Malfatto et al. (1993) studied Anaesthetised cats (animal model) (n=20). Bilateral vagotomy vs. Control conditions (before vagotomy) was evaluated on Duration of left ventricular endocardial monophasic action potential (APDmax and CL50) (p=<0.05). Bilateral vagotomy reduced APDmax and CL50 in cats with intact or partially reduced sympathetic tone (P<0.05), but had no effect when beta-adrenergic blockade was applied.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: