Key result
Complete radiofrequency ablation increased the size of ablated lesions by 47.1% compared to 2.1% in the partially ablated group, with significant differences in CT enhancement patterns.
Why the study?
What are the helical CT findings that differentiate complete from partial radiofrequency ablation in a rabbit lung tumor model?
What are the helical CT findings that differentiate complete from partial radiofrequency ablation in a rabbit lung tumor model?
Absolute Event Rate: 47.1% vs 2.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rabbit lung tumor model, complete and partial radiofrequency ablation can be differentiated on CT by the size of the ablated lesion and its enhancement pattern.
CT differentiation of ablation completeness is feasible in rabbit models; leaves open translation to human lung tumors.
Purpose: To evaluate the radiologic findings for complete and partial ablation after percutaneous CT-guided transthoracic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of lung VX2 tumor implanted in rabbits. Materials and Methods: Thirteen rabbits with successfully implanted lung VX2 were used. Three rabbits as controls did not receive RFA while the other ten rabbits underwent RFA; 5 complete and 5 partial. RFA was performed using an internally cooled, 17-gauge electrode (Radionics, Burlington, MA) with a 1-cm active tip under CT guidance. Postprocedural CT was performed within 3 days, and we analyzed the ablated size, enhancement pattern, shape, margin, and complications of the complete and partial ablation groups. Rabbits were sacrificed after postprocedural CT with an overdose of ketamine, and pathologic findings of the ablated groups were compared with those of the control group. Results: The size of the ablated lesions and the enhancement pattern differed between the completely and partially ablated groups on chest CT. The size of the ablated lesions was increased by 47.1% in the completely ablated group and by 2.1% in the partially ablated group. In the completely ablated group, VX2 tumor showed absolutely no enhancement, whereas only ablated pulmonary parenchyma outside VX2 showed mild enhancement on enhanced CT. In the partial ablated group, a part of VX2 became strongly enhanced on enhanced CT. On microscopic examination, the completely ablated group demonstrated that a viable tumor cell was not visible. In the partially ablated group, however, a viable tumor cell within the surrounding fibrous capsule on the peripheral area of the VX2 was observed. Conclusion: The important CT findings for evaluation of complete and partial RFA are the ablated size and enhancement pattern of the ablated lesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2004) studied Lung VX2 tumor (n=13). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. No RFA (control) and partial RFA was evaluated on Increase in size of ablated lesions on CT (p=<0.05). Complete radiofrequency ablation increased the size of ablated lesions by 47.1% compared to 2.1% in the partially ablated group, with significant differences in CT enhancement patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: