Key result
A high-MUFA dietary formula with the lowest glycemic index increased postprandial sICAM-1 AUC by 1.2 to 1.4-fold (P<0.001) compared to control and high-fiber formulas in non-diabetic subjects.
Why the study?
Does the nutrient composition of dietary formulas (high-MUFA or high-fiber) improve postprandial endothelial inflammation in non-diabetic subjects?
RCT (n=8)
Double-blind
Randomized crossover
No
Does the nutrient composition of dietary formulas (high-MUFA or high-fiber) improve postprandial endothelial inflammation in non-diabetic subjects?
Effect estimate: 1.2 to 1.4-fold higher
p-value: p=<0.001
A high-MUFA dietary formula with a low glycemic index may paradoxically increase postprandial endothelial inflammatory markers compared to high-fiber or control formulas in non-diabetic subjects.
High-MUFA low-GI formulas may increase postprandial endothelial inflammation; challenges presumed vascular benefits of such compositions in non-diabetics.
The emerging role of endothelial inflammation in diabetes has stimulated research interest in the effects of nutrition on related indices. In the current study we investigated whether the nutrient composition of dietary formula as reflected in glycemic index (GI) may be predictive of postprandial endothelial inflammation in non-diabetic subjects. A double-blinded, randomized, crossover study was conducted in non-diabetic subjects (n = 8/group). Each subject consumed three types of diabetes-specific dietary formulas (high-fiber formula [FF], high-monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) formula [MF] and control formula [CF]) standardized to 50 g of available carbohydrates with a 1-week interval between each. The mean glycemic index (GI) was calculated and 3-hour postprandial responses of insulin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), nitrotyrosine (NT) and free fatty acids (FFA) were measured. The MF showed the lowest mean GI and significantly low area under the curve (AUC) for insulin (P = 0.038), but significantly high AUCs for sICAM-1 (P < 0.001) and FFA (P < 0.001) as compared to the CF and FF. The FF showed intermediate mean GI, but significantly low AUC for NT (P < 0.001) as compared to the CF and MF. The mean GI was not positively correlated to any of the inflammatory markers evaluated, and in fact negatively correlated to changes in FFA (r = -0.473, P = 0.006). While the MF with the lowest GI showed the highest values in most of the inflammatory markers measured, the FF with intermediate GI had a modest beneficial effect on endothelial inflammation. These results suggest that nutrient composition of dietary formula as reflected in the GI may differently influence acute postprandial inflammation in non-diabetic subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Healthy non-diabetic subjects (n=8). High-MUFA formula (MF) and high-fiber formula (FF) vs. Control formula (CF) was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) (1.2 to 1.4-fold higher, p=<0.001). A high-MUFA dietary formula with the lowest glycemic index increased postprandial sICAM-1 AUC by 1.2 to 1.4-fold (P<0.001) compared to control and high-fiber formulas in non-diabetic subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: