Key result
Cognitive-physical training did not yield superior overall cognitive gains compared to cognitive training alone, although the addition of counseling to cognitive-physical training led to stronger gains in verbal fluency (p=0.03).
Why the study?
Does cognitive-physical training improve cognitive performance in healthy older adults compared to cognitive training alone?
RCT (n=68)
Single-blind (assessors blinded)
Block randomization (blocks of three)
Yes
Does cognitive-physical training improve cognitive performance in healthy older adults compared to cognitive training alone?
Effect estimate: η2p = 0.10
p-value: p=0.03
Cognitive-physical training does not yield superior cognitive gains compared to cognitive training alone in healthy older adults, though it provides additional physical fitness benefits.
Adding physical training to cognitive training yields no overall cognitive benefit in healthy older adults; challenges combined paradigms and leaves counseling effects on fluency open.
Data is inconsistent concerning the question whether cognitive-physical training (CPT) yields stronger cognitive gains than cognitive training (CT). Effects of additional counseling, neurobiological mechanisms, and predictors have scarcely been studied. Healthy older adults were trained with CT (n = 20), CPT (n = 25), or CPT with counseling (CPT+C; n = 23). Cognition, physical fitness, BDNF, IGF-1, and VEGF were assessed at pre- and post-test. No interaction effects were found except for one effect showing that CPT+C led to stronger gains in verbal fluency than CPT (p = 0.03). However, this superiority could not be assigned to additional physical training gains. Low baseline cognitive performance and BDNF, not carrying apoE4, gains in physical fitness and the moderation of gains in physical fitness × gains in BDNF predicted training success. Although all types of interventions seem successful to enhance cognition, our data do not support the hypotheses that CPT shows superior CT gains compared to CT or that CPT+C adds merit to CPT. However, as CPT leads to additional gains in physical fitness which in turn is known to have positive impact on cognition in the long-term, CPT seems more beneficial. Training success can partly be predicted by neuropsychological, neurobiological, and genetic parameters. Unique Identifier: WHO ICTRP (http://www.who.int/ictrp); ID: DRKS00005194.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahe et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Healthy older adults (n=68). Cognitive-physical training (CPT) with or without counseling vs. Cognitive training (CT) alone was evaluated on Alternating letter verbal fluency (CPT+C vs CPT) (η2p = 0.10, p=0.03). Cognitive-physical training did not yield superior overall cognitive gains compared to cognitive training alone, although the addition of counseling to cognitive-physical training led to stronger gains in verbal fluency (p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: