Key result
Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT phase analysis showed good correlation with left ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging (r=0.77 for histogram bandwidth, p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) accurately assess left ventricular dyssynchrony compared to tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in heart failure patients eligible for CRT?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
Blinded
Does phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) accurately assess left ventricular dyssynchrony compared to tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in heart failure patients eligible for CRT?
Effect estimate: r=0.77
p-value: p=<0.0001
Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (specifically histogram bandwidth and phase SD) correlates well with tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging for assessing left ventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure patients.
Supports GMPS phase analysis for dyssynchrony assessment; leaves open prospective outcome validation before CRT guidance.
PURPOSE: To compare left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony assessment by phase analysis from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) with LV dyssynchrony assessment by tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). Baseline LV dyssynchrony assessed with standard deviation (SD) of time-to-peak systolic velocity of 12 LV segments (Ts-SD) with TDI has proven to be a powerful predictor of response to CRT. Information on LV dyssynchrony can also be provided by GMPS with phase analysis of regional LV maximal count changes throughout the cardiac cycle. METHODS: Forty heart failure patients, referred for evaluation of potential eligibility for CRT, underwent both 3D echocardiography, with tri-plane TDI, and resting GMPS. From tri-plane TDI, Ts-SD was used as a validated parameter of LV dyssynchrony and compared with different indices (histogram bandwidth, phase SD, histogram skewness and kurtosis) derived from phase analysis of GMPS. RESULTS: Histogram bandwidth and phase SD showed good correlation with Ts-SD (r=0.77 and r=0.74, p<0.0001, respectively). Patients with substantial LV dyssynchrony assessed with tri-plane TDI (Ts-SD >or=33 ms) had also significantly higher values of histogram bandwidth and phase SD. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the use of phase analysis by GMPS to evaluate LV dyssynchrony. Histogram bandwidth and phase SD showed the best correlation with Ts-SD assessed with tri-plane TDI and appeared the most optimal variables for assessment of LV dyssynchrony with GMPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marsan et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=40). Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) phase analysis vs. Tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was evaluated on Correlation of GMPS histogram bandwidth with TDI Ts-SD (r=0.77, p=<0.0001). Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT phase analysis showed good correlation with left ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging (r=0.77 for histogram bandwidth, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: