Key result
RT3DE and Doppler tissue imaging showed a 75% concordance rate for assessing mechanical dyssynchrony, but no significant correlation between their respective indices (r=0.14, P=0.3).
Why the study?
Does real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) improve the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony compared to Doppler tissue imaging in CRT candidates?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Does real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) improve the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony compared to Doppler tissue imaging in CRT candidates?
Effect estimate: r = 0.14
p-value: p=0.3
RT3DE-derived SDI-16 may be a more useful tool than DTI for quantifying left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, as it correlates better with QRS duration and LVEF.
RT3DE and DTI indices should not be used interchangeably for dyssynchrony; leaves open optimal modality for CRT selection.
PURPOSE: To assess left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) using real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) and comparing it with the different dyssynchrony indices derived from Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) for the same patient. METHODS: The study included 60 consecutive patients who were considered candidates for CRT, i.e., having ejection fraction ≤35%, NYHA class III or ambulatory class IV, QRS duration ≥120 msec, on optimal pharmacological therapy. Apical RT3DE full volumes were obtained and analyzed to generate the systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI-16), which is the standard deviation of the time to minimal systolic volume of the 16 segments of LV. Color-coded DTI was performed for the three standard apical views with estimation of the mechanical dyssynchrony index (12 Ts-SD), which is the standard deviation of the time to peak systolic velocity at 12 segments of LV. RESULTS: SDI-16 was 10.96 ± 3.9% (cutoff value: 8.3%), while Ts-SD was 38 ± 10.2 msec (cutoff value: 32.6 msec). The concordance rate for both indices was 75%; however, there was no correlation between both indices (r = 0.14, P = 0.3). SDI-16 showed good correlation with QRS duration (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and inverse correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) calculated by RT3DE (r =-0.37, P = 0.004), while 12 Ts-SD index showed no correlation with QRS duration (r =-0.0082, P = 0.51) or 2D LVEF (r =-0.26, P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: RT3DE can quantify LVMD by providing the SDI-16 and it may prove to be more useful than DTI as it shows increasing dyssynchrony with increased QRS duration and decreased LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samir et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n=60). Real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) vs. Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) was evaluated on Correlation between SDI-16 (RT3DE) and 12 Ts-SD (DTI) indices (r = 0.14, p=0.3). RT3DE and Doppler tissue imaging showed a 75% concordance rate for assessing mechanical dyssynchrony, but no significant correlation between their respective indices (r=0.14, P=0.3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: