Key result
A perfusion microwave electrode used for 5 minutes induced a similar range of tissue coagulation (44.8 x 31.2 mm) as radiofrequency ablation used for 12 minutes (46.0 x 30.2 mm) in an in vivo porcine liver model.
Why the study?
Does microwave coagulation using a perfusion microwave electrode increase the range of tissue coagulation compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation in liver models?
Does microwave coagulation using a perfusion microwave electrode increase the range of tissue coagulation compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation in liver models?
A perfusion microwave electrode with saline infusion achieves a similar range of tissue coagulation in 5 minutes as conventional radiofrequency ablation does in 12 minutes in a porcine liver model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable shorter ablation times for equivalent liver coagulation in porcine models; leaves open translation to human practice.
To assess the coagulation capability of a perfusion microwave electrode (PME) as a key component of microwave coagulation therapy, a preliminary experimental study was performed using ex vivo and in vivo livers. For a microwave electrode, a PME was employed. Using a PME, saline was passed through the electrode and injected continuously into the target tissue. Using an ex vivo bovine liver, the range of tissue coagulation was measured for various volumes of infused saline and microwave outputs. Using an in vivo porcine liver, the efficiency of coagulation by a PME was compared with that of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a cool-tip needle. In an ex vivo bovine liver, the range of tissue coagulation increased as the flow rate of saline increased. In the in vivo porcine liver, the range of coagulation was similar to that found in the ex vivo bovine liver. With a PME under conditions of a microwave output of 80 W, a flow rate of 3 ml/min and irradiation time of 5 min, the range of coagulation was 44.8±2.8 mm [maximum vertical diameter: (a)] x 31.2±2.4 mm [maximum transverse diameter: (b)]. The range of RFA (cool-tip needle) at 12 min was 46.0±2.0 mm (a) x 30.2±2.0 mm (b). With only 5 min of microwave irradiation, the use of a PME enabled induction of the same range of coagulation that was obtainable by RFA for 12 min. In comparison with microwave coagulation without saline infusion, the use of a PME made it possible to extend the range of tissue coagulation to a range equal to that of RFA in a short time. Microwave coagulation using a PME may be one of the suitable tissue coagulation systems for local ablation treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umehara et al. (2011) studied Liver tissue coagulation (experimental model) (n=10). Perfusion microwave electrode (PME) vs. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a cool-tip needle was evaluated on Range of tissue coagulation (maximum vertical diameter in mm). A perfusion microwave electrode used for 5 minutes induced a similar range of tissue coagulation (44.8 x 31.2 mm) as radiofrequency ablation used for 12 minutes (46.0 x 30.2 mm) in an in vivo porcine liver model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: