In guinea-pig smooth muscle, the functional consequences of allosteric interactions between different calcium antagonists are small, and calcium channel binders do not potentiate calmodulin binders.
Small functional consequences of calcium antagonist interactions in animal tissue; leaves open relevance to human cardiovascular pharmacology.
The functional significance of the interaction of certain calcium-antagonists with nimodipine was examined so that this might be related to binding studies. To this end, the relaxant effects of nimodipine (1-100 nM) on Ca2+ (10 mM)-induced contractions of K+-depolarized taenia preparations from the guinea-pig caecum were compared in the presence of nifedipine and cinnarizine (which competitively displace [3H]-nimodipine with high and low affinities respectively), diltiazem (which increases binding), verapamil (which allosterically reduces binding) and W-7, a calmodulin antagonist. The relaxant effects of nimodipine were similar in the presence of nifedipine, diltiazem and cinnarizine, but were slightly attenuated in the presence of verapamil and W-7. These findings can be reconciled with the differentiation of calcium antagonists evident from [3H]-nimodipine binding studies, but indicate that the functional consequences of allosteric interactions disclosed in such studies are small. Drugs which bind to calcium channels and drugs which bind to calmodulin did not potentiate each other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Spedding (1983) studied this question. Nimodipine vs. Nimodipine in the presence of nifedipine, cinnarizine, diltiazem, verapamil, and W-7 was evaluated on Relaxant effects on Ca2+ (10 mM)-induced contractions of K+-depolarized taenia preparations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: