Key result
Subcostal assessment of right ventricular free wall contractility using M-mode identified normal RV systolic function with an AUC of 0.753 (95% CI 0.604-0.868).
Why the study?
Normal RV function is traditionally assessed from the apical window, but the subcostal window is the only available acoustic view in several patients.
Does subcostal assessment of right ventricular free wall contractility accurately identify normal right ventricular systolic function compared to standard apical TAPSE?
Observational
Does subcostal assessment of right ventricular free wall contractility accurately identify normal right ventricular systolic function compared to standard apical TAPSE?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.753 (95% CI 0.604-0.868)
Subcostal echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular free wall contractility using M-mode and TDI provides a feasible and accurate alternative for evaluating RV systolic function when apical views are suboptimal.
Subcostal RV free wall motion may aid RV assessment when apical views fail; leaves open validation against reference standards in prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Normal right ventricular (RV) function has been traditionally assessed from the apical window. However, in several patients the subcostal window is the only available acoustic. METHODS: Given the intricate functional and mechanical inter-dependence between longitudinal tricuspid annular (TA) displacement and RV free wall contractility (RVFW), we studied the utility of RVFW inward motion using both M-mode and velocity with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) from the subcostal transthoracic view. RESULTS: If a TAPSE value ≥ 2 cm is used to identify normal RV function, an RVFW M-mode value > .8 cm, TA TDI s' velocity > .06 cm/s and TA TDI e' velocity value > .05 cm/s identify normal RV systolic function. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis for the RVFW M-mode showed an area under the curve (AUC) of .753 (95% CI: .604-.868) with a cut-off value > .8, sensitivity 75% and specificity 73%; for TA TDI s' AUC at .822 (95% CI: .681-.919) with a cut-off value > .06, sensitivity 75% and specificity 77% and for TA TDI e' the AUC was .771 (95% CI: .624-.882) with a cut-off value > .05, sensitivity 90% and specificity 46%. Reproducibility of repeat RVFW M-mode, TDI s' and e' measurements was good with strong inter-rater agreement (Kappa > .8). CONCLUSIONS: The subcostal window appears useful for assessing RV systolic function. Additional studies are now required to prospectively use these measures in the routine evaluation of RV systolic function particularly in patients with suboptimal apical windows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López‐Candales et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Right ventricular systolic function assessment. Subcostal transthoracic view (RVFW M-mode and TDI) vs. Apical window (TAPSE ≥ 2 cm) was evaluated on Identification of normal RV systolic function (AUC 0.753, 95% CI 0.604-0.868). Subcostal assessment of right ventricular free wall contractility using M-mode identified normal RV systolic function with an AUC of 0.753 (95% CI 0.604-0.868).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: