Key result
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes can deliver overall cost-savings per patient for healthcare institutions and the wider community by reducing critical care and hospital length of stay.
Why the study?
The global economic burden of healthcare continues to grow, necessitating methods to mitigate costs while maintaining high standards of care.
Do enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes deliver economic benefits and cost-savings?
Do enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes deliver economic benefits and cost-savings?
Implementation of ERAS programs yields overall cost savings for healthcare institutions and the wider community, primarily through reduced hospital and critical care stays.
ERAS may lower surgical costs; leaves open need for higher-level confirmation before broad adoption.
The global economic burden of healthcare is set to continue to grow for the foreseeable future and methods must be sought to mitigate this burden whilst maintaining the high standard of care we expect to deliver to our patients. There have been numerous studies abundantly demonstrating the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes and more recently these have included studies looking into the economic benefits. It has now been demonstrated that implementation of ERAS programmes can deliver an overall cost-saving per patient for the institution delivering the surgery itself but also the wider community including primary care providers. Initial implementation is likely to incur an initial cost to the provider, most commonly in the form of employing new, dedicated ERAS personnel or procurement of new medications. Subsequent savings are largely the result of patient’s stay on critical care and within the hospital itself with both likely to be significantly reduced if a patient is enrolled on an ERAS programme. This article explores the literature currently available which has looked into the health economics surrounding ERAS programmes for a number of surgical specialities and from around the world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2019) conducted a review in Surgery. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes was evaluated on Economic benefits and cost-savings. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes can deliver overall cost-savings per patient for healthcare institutions and the wider community by reducing critical care and hospital length of stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: