Many peptidases are thought to require non-active site interaction surfaces, or exosites, to recognize and cleave physiological substrates with high specificity and catalytic efficiency. However, the existence and function of protease exosites remain obscure owing to a lack of effective methods to identify and characterize exosite-interacting substrates. To address this need, we modified the cellular libraries of peptide substrates (CLiPS) methodology to enable the discovery of exosite-interacting peptide ligands. Invariant cleavage motifs recognized by the active sites of thrombin and caspase-7 were displayed on the outer surface of bacteria adjacent to a candidate exosite-interacting peptide. Exosite peptide libraries were then screened for ligands that accelerate cleavage of the active site recognition motif using two-color flow cytometry. Exosite CLiPS (eCLiPS) identified exosite-binding peptides for thrombin that were highly similar to a critical exosite interaction motif in the thrombin substrate, protease-activated receptor 1. Protease activity probes incorporating exosite-binding peptides were cleaved ten-fold faster than substrates without exosite ligands, increasing their sensitivity to thrombin activity in vitro. For comparison, screening with caspase-7 yielded peptides that modestly enhanced (two-fold) substrate cleavage rates. The eCLiPS method provides a new tool to profile the ligand specificity of protease exosites and to develop improved substrates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jabaiah et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: