Key result
Different body positions, contrast injection, increased heart rate, and ischemia altered computerized vectorcardiography parameters, with STC-VM ≥50 microV being the most sensitive ischemia marker.
Why the study?
How do body position, heart rate, contrast fluid, and myocardial ischemia affect on-line computerized vectorcardiography parameters in patients with and without coronary artery disease?
Observational
How do body position, heart rate, contrast fluid, and myocardial ischemia affect on-line computerized vectorcardiography parameters in patients with and without coronary artery disease?
STC-VM is the most sensitive vectorcardiography parameter for monitoring myocardial ischemia, whereas QRS-VD is heavily influenced by non-ischemic factors and should not be used as a single marker.
STC-VM ≥50 μV may flag ischemia amid confounders; leaves open prospective validation of on-line vectorcardiography before clinical use.
UNLABELLED: On-line computerized vectorcardiography (cVCG) is increasingly being used for continuous monitoring of myocardial ischemia, however, little is known about factors other than ischemia causing electrocardiographic abnormalities. This paper describes how three important cVCG parameters, STC-VM, ST-VM and QRS-VD, are affected by different body positions, myocardial ischemia, contrast injection and increasing heart rate in patients with and without coronary artery disease. The main findings of the study are: contrast injection and different body positions caused major changes in QRS-VD but affected ST-VM and STC-VM to a minor degree. Increasing heart rate by atrial pacing produced substantial changes in all three parameters. Ischemia during angioplasty also produced changes in all three parameters, STC-VM being the most sensitive parameter. IN CONCLUSION: (1) STC-VM (> or = 50 microV) is the most valuable parameter for monitoring ischemia; (2) we propose ST-VM > or = 50 microV as criterion instead of previously used 25 microV; (3) QRS-VD cannot be used as a single marker of ischemia, and (4) electrocardiographic changes induced by increased heart rate should be taken into account during interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease. Different body positions, myocardial ischemia, contrast injection, and increasing heart rate was evaluated on Changes in cVCG parameters (STC-VM, ST-VM, and QRS-VD). Different body positions, contrast injection, increased heart rate, and ischemia altered computerized vectorcardiography parameters, with STC-VM ≥50 microV being the most sensitive ischemia marker.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: