Qualitative theoretical analysis reveals shifting geopolitical realignments across South Asia under the Belt and Road Initiative, indicating a growing challenge to India's historical dominance.
This research paper provides a comprehensive and detailed elucidation of the evolving power dynamics within the South Asian region, specifically focusing on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). With its extensive investments, the BRI has had far-reaching implications on the established geopolitical landscape, significantly reshaping India's traditional role and precipitating noteworthy shifts in the regional power structure. By spearheading the BRI, China has instigated substantial geopolitical realignments in South Asia, raising questions about India's historical predominance and the responses from neighbouring countries, particularly Pakistan. This paper explores the multifaceted ramifications of the BRI for India's hegemony, regional power structures, and geopolitical affiliations in South Asia. The study highlights the geopolitical consequences of the BRI's expansionist strategy along critical communication corridors linking Eurasia and Oceania, illuminating potential realignments and power dynamics within the South Asian geopolitical landscape. The theoretical framework of this paper employs a hybrid approach that integrates neorealist principles of power acquisition and competition with constructivist insights into identity and norms, analyzing how China's BRI reshapes the South Asian geopolitical landscape and challenges India's historical dominance. This research paper underscores the need for regional actors to recalibrate their strategies in light of China's broad geopolitical presence. It provides essential insights for scholars and policymakers to enhance strategic decisions and foster collaboration among South Asian nations in an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: