Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Philosophical analysis demonstrates dramatic irony and Hamann's humor in Kierkegaard's Christian paradox, highlighting how literary devices illuminate theological offense.
This article explores the role of irony, humor and intertextual dialogue with Hamann in Kierkegaard’s approach to the Christian paradox in Philosophical Fragments . What kind of irony characterizes the dialogue between the offended understanding and the paradox in “Offense at the Paradox (An Acoustical Illusion)” in Philosophical Fragments ? I argue that the theological and philosophical significance of the paradox is brought out through the paradoxical form of dramatic irony, and I explore how this relates to Hamann. To shed further light on the traces of Hamann, I examine also Kierkegaard’s comments on Hamann, “the greatest humorist,” in journal entries and other writings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iben Damgaard (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: