Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study observes modest links between self-efficacy and self-reported physical activity in healthcare students, indicating perceived confidence poorly mirrors device-tracked exercise.
PA is associated with numerous physical and mental health benefits, while self-efficacy is an important associated factor of health-related behaviors. However, evidence of the relationship between general self-efficacy and PA among healthcare students remains limited. This cross-sectional study included 747 healthcare students who completed an online survey comprising the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), IPAQ-SF, and measures of PA habits. A subsample of 50 participants additionally completed one week of activity monitoring using a Fitbit Versa 4. Associations were examined using non-parametric tests, Spearman’s rank correlation analyses, and multivariable linear regression models. Higher general self-efficacy was associated with greater self-reported PA, more frequent PA habits, and better self-rated physical fitness. Self-efficacy was also weakly associated with lower sitting time during weekends, but not during working days. Bivariate associations between self-efficacy and physical activity-related measures were weak (|ρ| ≤ 0.284). Total self-reported PA remained independently associated with self-efficacy in multivariable models, while the association with exercise frequency was attenuated after accounting for self-rated physical fitness. Model explanatory power was modest (adjusted R2 = 0.054–0.073). No clear associations were observed between self-efficacy and objectively measured weekly steps or active zone minutes. The agreement between self-reported and device-based measures was partial. General self-efficacy was associated with self-reported PA and perceived physical fitness, although associations were modest. Findings should be interpreted cautiously given the cross-sectional design, small monitoring subgroup, and multiple exploratory comparisons. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify temporal relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spundiņa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: