Key result
In a systematic review of 255 patients, the use of an allograft prosthetic composite for proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieved an 84% graft incorporation rate.
Why the study?
Proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision shoulder arthroplasty is an emerging and challenging problem as reverse shoulder arthroplasty use increases.
Does an allograft prosthetic composite (APC) improve functional outcomes and graft incorporation in patients with proximal humeral bone deficiency undergoing revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Systematic Review (n=255)
Does an allograft prosthetic composite (APC) improve functional outcomes and graft incorporation in patients with proximal humeral bone deficiency undergoing revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports allograft prosthetic composite use in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral deficiency; extends pooled evidence on graft incorporation.
Background: Proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision shoulder arthroplasty is an emerging and challenging problem as the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) increases. This paper presents a technical note discussing our detailed preoperative planning steps, surgical techniques, and their rationale in carrying out the use of an allograft prosthetic composite (APC) to address proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision RSA. The outcomes of this technique are also presented. This paper also presents a systematic review to further discuss the existing literature on RSA with APCs. Methods: The preoperative surgical planning and the surgical technique employed to execute proximal humeral reconstruction using APC during revision arthroplasty are discussed in the technical note. The preliminary clinical and radiological results of five patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral reconstruction using APCs are presented. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform the systematic review. A systematic search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted. All studies involving RSA and APCs were pooled, and the data were extracted and analyzed. Results: A total of 14 studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review, with a total of 255 patients and a mean follow-up of 57 months. All studies in the systematic review and the patients included in the author’s case series showed improvements in the level of pain, range of motion, function, and satisfaction. Graft incorporation in the systematic review was 84%. Conclusions: Based on the available literature and the results of our case series, the use of an APC construct is a viable option for proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision shoulder arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision shoulder arthroplasty (n=255). Allograft prosthetic composite (APC) was evaluated on Graft incorporation. In a systematic review of 255 patients, the use of an allograft prosthetic composite for proximal humeral bone deficiency in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieved an 84% graft incorporation rate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: