Key result
Intravenous rt-PA for suspected myocardial infarction was cost-effective compared to placebo, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 3090 to 5970 SEK per life year saved.
Why the study?
Does intravenous rt-PA improve quality of life and is it cost-effective in patients with suspected myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=313)
placebo-controlled
randomized
Does intravenous rt-PA improve quality of life and is it cost-effective in patients with suspected myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: 3090 to 5970 SEK per life year saved
Intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA is a cost-effective treatment strategy in the first year after suspected myocardial infarction.
Supports rt-PA use in suspected MI; confirms cost-effectiveness alongside clinical benefits in this RCT.
The aim of this randomized placebo-controlled study is to ascertain the costs of intravenous thrombolytic therapy (rt-PA) in the first year after suspected myocardial infarction and to measure the treatment effect on quality of life. The main findings are that the direct costs (including all health care expenditure), on average were 9880 SEK higher in the rt-PA group (N = 153) than in the placebo group (N = 160). At the same time the indirect costs were 4200 SEK lower in the rt-PA group. The total cost of the first year after suspected myocardial infarction were on average 5680 SEK higher in the rt-PA group. The treatment gain in mean life expectancy calculated with a yearly mortality rate of 6% from the end of follow up was 1.25 years. Quality of life was measured using the Nottingham Health Profile and was classified according to NYHAs functional classification. The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) results show that the rt-PA patients had a slightly higher (worse) score in all dimensions after one month with the exception of sleep. After 12 months the differences no longer exist and the rt-PA patients had even lower (better) scores in the sleep and energy dimensions. The calculated cost-effectiveness ratio varies from 3090 to 5970 SEK per life year saved and the calculated cost-utility ratio varies from 3260 SEK to 6310 SEK per QALY gained. In comparison with other heart disease treatments, intravenous thrombolysis is cost-effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levin et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in suspected myocardial infarction (n=313). intravenous rt-PA vs. placebo was evaluated on cost-effectiveness ratio (3090 to 5970 SEK per life year saved). Intravenous rt-PA for suspected myocardial infarction was cost-effective compared to placebo, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 3090 to 5970 SEK per life year saved.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: