Key result
Coronary artery bypass surgery improved survival compared to medical treatment in men with stable angina and at least two-vessel disease.
Why the study?
Does coronary artery bypass surgery improve survival in men under 65 years with mild-to-moderate angina, at least two-vessel disease, and good left ventricular function compared to medical treatment?
RCT (n=768)
Does coronary artery bypass surgery improve survival in men under 65 years with mild-to-moderate angina, at least two-vessel disease, and good left ventricular function compared to medical treatment?
Coronary artery bypass surgery significantly improves survival compared to medical therapy in men under 65 with mild-to-moderate angina and at least two-vessel disease, particularly those with three-vessel disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports CABG for survival in men <65 with mild-moderate angina and multivessel disease; extends evidence to preserved LV function.
This progress report on the prospective randomized study of the effect of coronary bypass surgery on prognosis presents the results of a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Seven hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited; all were men younger than age 65 years who had mild-to-moderate angina pectoris, at least two-vessel disease, and good left ventricular function. Of these, 373 were randomized to medical treatment and 395 to surgical treatment. Although 83 "medical" patients subsequently underwent surgery and 27 "surgical" patients did not undergo surgery, these patients were not excluded from the analysis, and the group randomized to coronary bypass surgery was compared with the group randomized to medical treatment. The surgical treatment group showed significantly better survival than the medical treatment group in the total patient population (p less than 0.001), particularly among patients with three-vessel disease (p less than 0.001). Although the 24% higher survival among surgical patients with left main coronary artery disease failed to reach statistical significance, the trend is probably meaningful. No significant difference in survival between medical and surgical treatment groups was noted in patients with two-vessel disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1982 study conducted an RCT in Stable angina pectoris (n=768). Coronary artery bypass surgery vs. Medical treatment was evaluated on Survival (p=<0.001). Coronary artery bypass surgery improved survival compared to medical treatment in men with stable angina and at least two-vessel disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: