What question did this study set out to answer?

To examine the relationship between right-wing populism, education, and science by analyzing continuities and establishing a critical boundary framework beyond simple demarcation or confrontation.

November 27, 2020Zeitschrift für WeiterbildungsforschungOpen Access

Neither demarcation nor confrontation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

CHChristoph HakerHochschule Osnabrück LOLukas Otterspeerift Rosenheim

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Qualitative case analysis reveals epistemic divergence despite institutional continuities in right-wing populist scientific initiatives, highlighting key strategies for scientific boundary-work.

Key Points

To examine the relationship between right-wing populism, education, and science by analyzing continuities and establishing a critical boundary framework beyond simple demarcation or confrontation.
Applied the sociological theoretical framework of boundary-work across institutional, content-related, and epistemic dimensions.
Conducted a qualitative case analysis examining right-wing populist educational and scientific initiatives.
Identified strong institutional and content-related continuities linking right-wing populist efforts to established scientific and educational structures.
Demonstrated that the fundamental divergence between mainstream scholarship and right-wing populism exists primarily within the epistemic dimension.
Formulated a critical framework enabling researchers and educators to effectively delineate scientific knowledge without resorting to direct polarization.

Cite This Study

Haker et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9d516ad8a02169be46d950 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40955-020-00174-z

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Qualitative case analysis reveals epistemic divergence despite institutional continuities in right-wing populist scientific initiatives, highlighting key strategies for scientific boundary-work.

Neither demarcation nor confrontation

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Neither demarcation nor confrontation

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider