Key result
Latency characteristics of infectious laryngotracheitis virus in specific pathogen-free chickens did not substantially vary between the vaccine (SA2) and field (CL9) strains.
Why the study?
Latency is an important feature of infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) yet is poorly understood.
Latent ILTV infection and in vitro reactivation occur similarly in chickens inoculated with field or vaccine strains at 21 and 35 days post-infection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro reactivation systems enable ILTV latency studies; leaves open whether findings extend to commercial flocks or vaccine strategies.
Latency is an important feature of infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) yet is poorly understood. This study aimed to compare latency characteristics of vaccine (SA2) and field (CL9) strains of ILTV, establish an in vitro reactivation system and examine ILTV infection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in specific pathogen-free chickens. Birds were inoculated with SA2 or CL9 ILTV and then bled and culled at 21 or 35 days post-inoculation (dpi). Swabs (conjunctiva, palatine cleft, trachea) and trigeminal ganglia (TG) were examined for ILTV DNA using PCR. Half of the TG, trachea and PBMC were co-cultivated with cell monolayers to assess in vitro reactivation of ILTV infection. ILTV DNA was detected in the trachea of approximately 50% of ILTV‐inoculated birds at both timepoints. At 21 dpi, ILTV was detected in the TG only in 29% and 17% of CL9- and SA2-infected birds, respectively. At 35 dpi, ILTV was detected in the TG only in 30% and 10% of CL9- and SA2-infected birds, respectively. Tracheal organ co-cultures from 30% and 70% of CL9- and SA2-infected birds, respectively, were negative for ILTV DNA at cull but yielded quantifiable DNA within 6 days post-explant (dpe). TG co-cultivation from 30% and 40% of CL9-and SA2-infected birds, respectively, had detectable ILTV DNA within 6 dpe. Latency characteristics did not substantially vary based on the strain of virus inoculated or between sampling timepoints. These results advance our understanding of ILTV latency and reactivation.RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Following inoculation, latent ILTV infection was detected in a large proportion of chickens, irrespective of whether a field or vaccine strain was inoculated.In vitro reactivation of latent ILTV was readily detected in tracheal and trigeminal ganglia co-cultures using PCR.ILTV latency observed in SPF chickens at 21 days post-infection was not substantially different to 35 days post-infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thilakarathne et al. (2020) studied Infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) infection. Vaccine (SA2) strain of ILTV vs. Field (CL9) strain of ILTV was evaluated on Latency characteristics (ILTV DNA detection). Latency characteristics of infectious laryngotracheitis virus in specific pathogen-free chickens did not substantially vary between the vaccine (SA2) and field (CL9) strains.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: