Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 2000Critical Care Medicine

Electrocardiographic waveform analysis for predicting the success of defibrillation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

An amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) value of 21 mV x Hz predicted the failure of a shock to reestablish spontaneous circulation with a 96% negative predictive value in a porcine model.

Why the study?

Does amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) predict the success of defibrillation in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation?

Population

Porcine model of cardiac arrest because of ventricular fibrillation

Comparison

Electrocardiographic waveform analysis using… vs Coronary perfusion pressure

Design

Preclinical

Authors

HPHeitor P. PóvoasJBJoe Bisera

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

AMSA may guide defibrillation timing in VF; hypothesis-generating in porcine models and requires human validation.

Structured PICO

Does amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) predict the success of defibrillation in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation?

P
Population
Porcine model of cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.
E
Exposure
Electrocardiographic waveform analysis using amplitude spectrum area (AMSA)
C
Comparator
Coronary perfusion pressure (used as a reference for positive predictive value)
O
Outcome
Restoration of perfusing rhythm (success of defibrillation)surrogate

Main Result

Effect estimate: NPV 96%

Amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) is a promising electrocardiographic predictor that may guide optimal timing of defibrillation by accurately predicting the failure of shocks to restore spontaneous circulation.

Cite This Study

Póvoas et al. (2000) studied Cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) vs. Coronary perfusion pressure was evaluated on Restoration of perfusing rhythm (NPV 96%). An amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) value of 21 mV x Hz predicted the failure of a shock to reestablish spontaneous circulation with a 96% negative predictive value in a porcine model.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9d79488abc1d8b83a4c47bhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200011001-00010
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimizing timing of ventricular defibrillation2001 · 140 citations
  2. 2Prediction of Successful Defibrillation in Human Victims of Out-of-Hospital cArdiac Arrest: A Retrospective Electrocardiographic Analysis2008 · 47 citations
  3. 3Amplitude spectrum area: Measuring the probability of successful defibrillation as applied to human data2004 · 61 citations
  4. 4Wavelet transform-based prediction of the likelihood of successful defibrillation for patients exhibiting ventricular fibrillation2005 · 18 citations
  5. 5Electrocardiographic prediction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation success2000 · 2 citations