Why the study?
Does amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) predict the success of defibrillation in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation?
Does amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) predict the success of defibrillation in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation?
Amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) is a promising electrocardiographic predictor that may guide optimal timing of defibrillation by accurately predicting the failure of shocks to restore spontaneous circulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AMSA may guide defibrillation timing in VF; hypothesis-generating in porcine models and requires human validation.
A new electrocardiographic predictor of the likelihood that an electrical shock would restore a perfusing rhythm is described. The intent was to develop a prognosticator that would be displayed during precordial compression. We anticipated that such a predictor would allow more selective timing of electrical shocks and reduce electrical injury to the myocardium caused by repetitive shocks. In a porcine model of cardiac arrest because of ventricular fibrillation, electrocardiographic recordings of ventricular fibrillation wavelets were analyzed and transformed into an amplitude spectrum area (AMSA). An AMSA value of 21 mV x Hz predicted restoration of perfusing rhythm with a positive predictive value equivalent to that of coronary perfusion pressure. More important, the negative predictive value that a shock would fail to reestablish spontaneous circulation was 96%. AMSA, therefore, has the potential for guiding optimal timing of defibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Póvoas et al. (2000) studied Cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) vs. Coronary perfusion pressure was evaluated on Restoration of perfusing rhythm (NPV 96%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: