Key result
Embolectomy combined with open aortotomy was associated with 0% recurrent embolization (0 of 12 patients), compared to 66.7% (4 of 6 patients) with catheter embolectomy alone.
Why the study?
Does embolectomy combined with open aortotomy reduce recurrent embolization and mortality compared to catheter embolectomy alone in patients with distal emboli originating from aortic mural thrombus?
Observational (n=39)
Does embolectomy combined with open aortotomy reduce recurrent embolization and mortality compared to catheter embolectomy alone in patients with distal emboli originating from aortic mural thrombus?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 66.7%
Embolectomy combined with open aortotomy appears superior to catheter embolectomy alone for preventing recurrent embolization in patients with distal emboli originating from aortic mural thrombus.
May support combined embolectomy with aortotomy to limit recurrence; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
The association between white thrombus in the aorta and multiple embolic occlusions of peripheral vessels was made 22 years ago. However, mural thrombus has been neglected as a major cause of embolus because the process was attributed to paradoxical effects of heparin. Our recent experience indicates it is a more generalized problem. During the past five years, AP and lateral abdominal aortograms demonstrated the presence of large filling defects within the lumen of the aorta in 20 of 39 patients with sudden occlusion of a distal artery. Thirteen patients were not on heparin. These 3.4 X 1-2 cm defects were present anywhere from T-10 to the aortic bifurcation and were suprarenal in ten patients. The 20 patients had a total of 36 separate embolic events, with five patients experiencing seven occlusions of renal or superior mesenteric arteries. Serious medical problems coexisted, and all patients had at least two of five important "risk factors." These were heart disease, recent thrombophlebitis, heparin therapy, abdominal atherosclerosis and postoperative status. Catheter embolectomy alone was associated with recurrent embolization in four of six patients. Three patients died and two required amputation. Of 12 patients treated by embolectomy combined with open aortotomy, recurrent embolization occurred in none, death in one and amputation in two. All patients with visceral artery occlusions survived with normal function of the previously occluded structure. We urge wider application of abdominal angiography in order to treat more appropriately a sizable proportion of patients whose distal emboli originated from large chunks of white thrombus in the abdominal aorta.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1981) conducted an observational in Sudden occlusion of a distal artery (n=39). Embolectomy combined with open aortotomy vs. Catheter embolectomy alone was evaluated on Recurrent embolization. Embolectomy combined with open aortotomy was associated with 0% recurrent embolization (0 of 12 patients), compared to 66.7% (4 of 6 patients) with catheter embolectomy alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: