Key result
Open chest defibrillation threshold voltage (321 vs 321 volts, P>0.80) and energy (5.3 vs 6.1 joules, P>0.20) were not significantly different compared to closed chest measurements in canines.
Why the study?
Does opening the thorax influence defibrillation threshold in canines?
Does opening the thorax influence defibrillation threshold in canines?
Absolute Event Rate: 321% vs 321%
p-value: p=>0.80
Intraoperative testing of implantable defibrillators with an open chest is predictive of postoperative performance regarding voltage and energy thresholds, despite changes in impedance and current.
Open-chest defibrillation thresholds match closed-chest values in canines; leaves open translation to human intraoperative ICD testing.
To determine if intraoperative testing is predictive of implantable defibrillator performance postoperatively, we measured sequential pulse defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in 16 adult canines (28.0 +/- 3.5 kg, mean +/- SD body weight) at the time of epicardial defibrillation electrode implantation. Three epicardial defibrillation electrodes were sutured directly to the anterior, posterior, and left lateral epicardial surfaces of the heart through a left fifth intercostal thoracotomy. The pericardium was sutured closed over the electrodes and DFT was measured first with the thorax open and again after closing all surgical wounds, evacuating the thorax, and reinflating the lungs. Mean +/- SD DFT voltage, current, and impedance (pulse 1), and total delivered energy (both pulses) for the open chest measurements were 321 +/- 87 volts, 4.2 +/- 1.9 amps, 80 +/- 14 ohms and 5.3 +/- 3.7 joules, respectively. The corresponding DFT values for the closed chest measurements were 321 +/- 92 volts, 5.1 +/- 1.9 amps, 64 +/- 10 ohms and 6.1 +/- 3.9 joules, respectively. Paired Student's t-test comparison of open versus closed chest DFT values indicated that there were no significant differences in voltage (P greater than 0.80) or energy (P greater than 0.20), but there were significant differences in both current (P less than 0.01) and impedance (P less than 0.001). It is concluded that despite alterations in impedance and current flow, voltage and energy DFT are not significantly different between open and closed chest animals. This suggests that intraoperative testing of implantable defibrillators is predictive of postoperative performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael J. Kallok (1989) studied Defibrillation threshold testing (n=16). Open chest measurement vs. Closed chest measurement was evaluated on Defibrillation threshold (DFT) voltage (p=>0.80). Open chest defibrillation threshold voltage (321 vs 321 volts, P>0.80) and energy (5.3 vs 6.1 joules, P>0.20) were not significantly different compared to closed chest measurements in canines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: