Key result
Mean D-dimer levels at admission were significantly higher in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism compared to community-acquired pneumonia (3388 vs. 1190 µ/L, P=0.001).
Why the study?
Can quantitative D-dimer levels differentiate pulmonary thromboembolism from community-acquired pneumonia and monitor treatment response?
Observational (n=80)
Can quantitative D-dimer levels differentiate pulmonary thromboembolism from community-acquired pneumonia and monitor treatment response?
Absolute Event Rate: 3388% vs 1190%
p-value: p=0.001
Quantitative D-dimer levels >1700 µ/L can help differentiate pulmonary thromboembolism from community-acquired pneumonia, and rapid decreases may indicate treatment response in PTE.
Higher D-dimer in PTE versus pneumonia was observed; hypothesis-generating for differentiation and should not yet change practice.
Aim: To identify the quantitative D-dimer levels in pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and hospitalized-community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients, and to determine the alteration of D-dimer levels with anticoagulant or antibacterial therapy. It is not well known that the quantitative analysis of D-dimer has a role in the differential diagnosis of PTE from other diseases. Materials and methods: Serum D-dimer levels were measured and compared prospectively with a latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric method at admission, before initiating any antibiotic or anticoagulant therapy and then at days 3, 10, and 30 of treatment in PTE and CAP patients. Results: A total of 80 patients (45 PTE and 35 CAP), with a mean age of 61 ± 16 years, were included in the study. Mean D-dimer levels at admission were significantly higher in the PTE group than in the CAP group (3388 ± 2080 vs. 1190 ± 1089 µ/L, P = 0.001). After initiating the anticoagulant therapy, a significant decrease in D-dimer levels was identified in the PTE group, but not in the CAP group, on day 3 (678 ± 652 µ/L vs. 724 ± 907 µ/L). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, D-dimer levels of >1700 µ/L were statistically significant as a cut-off value for the diagnosis of PTE (AUC: 0.820; 95% CI: 0.73-0.92). Conclusion: Although serum quantitative D-dimer levels cannot be used solely for the differential diagnosis of CAP and PTE, they might be helpful in making the decision to perform further diagnostic methods. Since D-dimer levels decreased more rapidly and significantly in PTE than CAP cases, they might be used as a marker for monitoring the treatment response in patients with PTE, but this must be proven with more comprehensive studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varol et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Pulmonary thromboembolism and community-acquired pneumonia (n=80). Pulmonary thromboembolism vs. Community-acquired pneumonia was evaluated on Mean D-dimer levels at admission (µ/L) (p=0.001). Mean D-dimer levels at admission were significantly higher in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism compared to community-acquired pneumonia (3388 vs. 1190 µ/L, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: