Key result
Empagliflozin reduced left ventricular mass index in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease independently of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (Pinteraction = 0.60).
Why the study?
Given that empagliflozin induces left ventricular mass regression in T2D and CAD, the relationship between baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and cardiac reverse remodelling was evaluated.
Does empagliflozin reduce left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease independent of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio?
RCT (n=97)
randomized
Does empagliflozin reduce left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease independent of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio?
Empagliflozin treatment is associated with consistent reductions in left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease independent of baseline systemic inflammation as measured by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.
Supports empagliflozin for LVMI reduction in T2D with CAD irrespective of NLR; extends RCT evidence to inflammation-independent effects.
Aims The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of systemic inflammation and plays a critical role in the assessment and prognosis in patients with heart failure. The EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6 trial demonstrated that patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with a sodium–glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor for 6 months experienced regression in left ventricular mass. Given this, we evaluated the relationship of baseline NLR and cardiac reverse remodelling in the entire cohort of this trial. Methods and results A total of 97 individuals were randomized to receive empagliflozin (10 mg/day) or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome of the trial was change in left ventricular mass indexed to body surface area (LVMi) from baseline to 6 months as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In our analysis, the cohort was stratified above and below an NLR level of 2. To assess the treatment effect on the 6 month change in NLR, we used a linear model adjusting for baseline differences in NLR [analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)] that included an interaction term between the baseline NLR and treatment. To assess the treatment effect on the 6 month change in LVMi in each of the subgroups divided by baseline NLR, we used an ANCOVA adjusting for baseline differences in LVMi that included an interaction term between the subgroups and treatment. The results of the regression models were summarized as adjusted differences with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Patients who exhibited an elevated baseline NLR demonstrated higher LVMi and left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area than those with a lower NLR. In patients with an NLR < 2 and NLR ≥ 2, the adjusted difference in LVMi between the empagliflozin- and placebo-treated patients was −2.98 g/m2 (95% CI: −6.18 to 0.22 g/m2) (P value = 0.067) and −4.43 g/m2 (95% CI: −8.50 to −1.11 g/m2), respectively (Pinteraction = 0.60). Conclusions Empagliflozin treatment is associated with consistent reductions in LVMi in patients with T2D and CAD independent of baseline NLR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease (n=97). Empagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in left ventricular mass indexed to body surface area (LVMi) from baseline to 6 months (MD -4.43 g/m2 (NLR ≥ 2) and -2.98 g/m2 (NLR < 2), 95% CI -8.50 to -1.11 (NLR ≥ 2); -6.18 to 0.22 (NLR < 2), p=Pinteraction = 0.60). Empagliflozin reduced left ventricular mass index in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease independently of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (Pinteraction = 0.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: