Key result
Intravenous paracetamol will be evaluated against intravenous ibuprofen for the treatment of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in a planned non-inferiority randomized clinical trial of 300 preterm infants.
Why the study?
Does intravenous paracetamol improve the rate of ductus closure in preterm infants with hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus compared to intravenous ibuprofen?
RCT (n=300)
Double-blind
1:1 block randomization stratified by gestational age
Yes
Does intravenous paracetamol improve the rate of ductus closure in preterm infants with hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus compared to intravenous ibuprofen?
This study protocol outlines a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether intravenous paracetamol is as effective and safer than intravenous ibuprofen for the closure of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.
Planned non-inferiority RCT will test paracetamol versus ibuprofen for hsPDA in preterm infants; leaves open comparative efficacy and safety pending completion.
Background: Currently, the first line treatment of persistent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is either indomethacin or ibuprofen. However, the potentially life-threatening side effects associated to their use have prompted physicians to look for alternative options. The incorporation of paracetamol as an alternative to ibuprofen in the management of PDA is still based on insufficient clinical evidence. Hence, more clinical trials are needed to establish a therapeutic role for paracetamol in the management of PDA that take into consideration short- and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. Study Design: This is a non-inferiority, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy, and safety of intravenous (IV) paracetamol vs. IV ibuprofen (standard treatment) for PDA in preterm patients with a gestational age ≤ 30 weeks. At baseline, patients will be randomized (1:1) to treatment with paracetamol or ibuprofen. The primary endpoint is closure of the ductus after the first treatment course. Secondary endpoints are related to effectiveness (need for a second treatment course, rescue treatment, reopening rate, time to definitive closure, need for surgical ligation), safety (early and long-term complications), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, pharmacoeconomics, and genotoxicity. Long-term follow-up to 24 months of corrected postnatal age will be performed using Bayley III neurodevelopmental scale. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04037514. EudraCT: 2015-003177-14.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García‐Robles et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) (n=300). Intravenous paracetamol vs. Intravenous ibuprofen (10 mg/kg IV followed by 5 mg/kg IV at 24 and 48 h) was evaluated on Rate of hsPDA closure after one round of treatment (ductus diameter <1 mm on echocardiography). Intravenous paracetamol will be evaluated against intravenous ibuprofen for the treatment of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in a planned non-inferiority randomized clinical trial of 300 preterm infants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: