Key result
Prophylactic escitalopram did not reduce the incidence of major depression compared to placebo (7.6% vs 3.2%) during the first 12 weeks of interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C.
Why the study?
Does escitalopram prevent interferon alfa-2a-induced depression in chronic hepatitis C patients without baseline mental disorders?
RCT (n=133)
double-blind
randomly assigned
Yes
Does escitalopram prevent interferon alfa-2a-induced depression in chronic hepatitis C patients without baseline mental disorders?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.6% vs 3.2%
Prophylactic escitalopram does not prevent interferon-induced depression during the first 12 weeks of treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients at low psychiatric risk.
Prophylactic escitalopram should not be used to prevent interferon-induced depression in low-risk patients; confirms lack of benefit in this RCT.
Article Abstract Background: Depression is one of the main reasons for treatment withdrawal and failure in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with interferon. Antidepressants are useful for its treatment, but whether they can also be used for prevention has yet to be established. Method: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram for preventing interferon alfa-2a-induced depression, we conducted an investigator-initiated multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 133 chronic hepatitis C patients without baseline mental disorders who were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram or placebo during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Primary efficacy outcomes were the development of DSM-IV major depression and scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Primary safety end points were biochemical and virological responses. Patients were recruited between March 2005 and July 2006. Results: Rates of major depression were low (5.4%) and did not differ between placebo (3.2%) and escitalopram (7.6%). MADRS and HADS scores significantly increased during treatment (P < .001 and P = .028, respectively), but there were no differences between treatment groups. Sustained virological response was achieved by 69.2% of patients, 70.4% in the placebo group and 67.9% in the escitalopram group. Conclusions: Findings do not support the use of an antidepressant to prevent interferon-induced depression during the first 12 weeks of treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients at low psychiatric risk. Future studies should be directed to subpopulations of patients at high psychiatric risk. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00166296 J Clin Psychiatry Submitted: April 3, 2009; accepted October 19, 2009. Online ahead of print: October 5, 2010 (doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05282blu). Corresponding author: Crisanto Diez-Quevedo, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Ctra de Canyet s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain (cdiezquevedo.germanstrias@gencat.cat).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Díez et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in chronic hepatitis C (n=133). escitalopram vs. placebo was evaluated on development of DSM-IV major depression. Prophylactic escitalopram did not reduce the incidence of major depression compared to placebo (7.6% vs 3.2%) during the first 12 weeks of interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: