Key result
Prophylactic citalopram fails to reduce moderate depression vs placebo in HIV-HCV patients initiating PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin.
Why the study?
Depression related to interferon-alpha is common in HIV-HCV coinfected persons and may reduce adherence and treatment success, motivating prevention strategies.
Does prophylactic citalopram improve adherence and reduce moderate depression in HIV-HCV coinfected patients initiating PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin therapy?
RCT (n=76)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does prophylactic citalopram improve adherence and reduce moderate depression in HIV-HCV coinfected patients initiating PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.81 (95% CI 0.26–2.54)
p-value: p=0.32
Prophylactic citalopram does not significantly improve adherence or reduce the incidence of moderate depression in HIV-HCV coinfected patients undergoing PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin therapy.
Prophylactic citalopram confers no adherence or depression benefit in HIV-HCV coinfection; challenges routine prophylaxis and supports prompt treatment of emergent symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Depression related to interferon-alpha (IFN-α) is common, may reduce adherence, and can be treatment limiting. HIV-HCV coinfected persons experience lower sustained virologic response rates and commonly have psychiatric comorbidities, thus they may benefit from prevention of depression. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether prophylactic citalopram can increase HCV treatment adherence and reduce the incidence of moderate depression in HIV-HCV coinfected patients initiating PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin therapy. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated Canadian multicenter randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. HIV-HCV coinfected patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive citalopram or placebo 3 weeks prior to starting PEG-IFN-α2b/ribavirin, stratified by study center and HCV genotype. The protocol design permitted the comparison of prophylaxis with the treatment of emergent depression. The primary outcomes were adherence (assessed through questionnaire and returned medication) and time to moderate depression measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI- II) score greater than 15, confirmed 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (36 citalopram/40 placebo) were randomized. Overall adherence was high, ranging from 95% (week 12) to 91% (week 48). There was no difference between arms with respect to mean or median adherence at any study time point. Cumulative incidence of moderate depression did not differ significantly by group (log rank P = .32). The hazard ratio for moderate depression was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.26 to 2.54) for citalopram compared with placebo when adjusted for baseline BDI-II score. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of prophylactic citalopram compared to treatment of emergent depression was not associated with higher adherence or a reduction in treatment-limiting depression nor did it significantly reduce depressive symptoms among HIV-HCV coinfected persons during treatment for HCV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in HIV-HCV coinfection (n=76). Citalopram vs. Placebo was evaluated on Adherence and time to moderate depression (BDI-II score >15) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.54, p=0.32). Prophylactic citalopram did not significantly reduce moderate depression compared with placebo in HIV-HCV coinfected patients initiating PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.26-2.54; P=0.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: