Key result
Measurement of aortic augmentation index using radial applanation tonometry by inexperienced nurses demonstrated very high between-observer repeatability.
Why the study?
Is the measurement of aortic augmentation index (AIx) using radial applanation tonometry repeatable when performed by nurses with limited experience?
Observational (n=20)
Blinded to patient medical records and colleague's measurements
Is the measurement of aortic augmentation index (AIx) using radial applanation tonometry repeatable when performed by nurses with limited experience?
Measurement of aortic augmentation index using radial applanation tonometry shows high repeatability even when performed by relatively inexperienced nurses, supporting its potential use in clinical assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports AIx assessment by non-specialists; leaves open outcome validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Aortic augmentation index (AIx) measured using applanation tonometry is a non-invasive indicator of arterial stiffness. The objective of this study was to assess its repeatability when used by nurses with limited experience of the technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood pressure/augmentation index (BP/AIx) was measured 4 times in 20 consecutive ambulant patients (16 male) after they rested supine for 15 min. Two nurses independently and alternately measured BP/AIx using the same equipment (Omron HEM-757; SphygmoCor with Millar hand-held tonometer). Nurses were blinded to patient medical records and their colleague's AIx/BP. 'Within' and 'between' observer differences were assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (rI) and 95 % limits of agreement (95 % LoA) derived from Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Mean age was 56 (mean BP 136/79; mean pulse 64). Mean AIx was 24.1 (range 2.8 to 41.0). Both 'between' and 'within' observer repeatability was very high, with intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. Mean AIx readings 'between' observers differed by only 0.68 (95 % CI -0.24 to 1.59) with a high rI (0.98; 95 % CI 0.95 to 0.99) and a narrow 95 % LoA (-3.22 to 4.57). The 95 % LoA for 'within' observer repeatability was -6.75 to 7.95. Differences in AIx measurement did not vary over time or with increasing levels of AIx. CONCLUSIONS: Even when undertaken by relatively inexperienced operators, both 'within' and 'between' observer repeatability of AIx measurement is very high. Such non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness has the potential to be included in the clinical assessment of ambulant patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crilly et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Ambulant patients (n=20). Measurement of augmentation index (AIx) using radial applanation tonometry was evaluated on Between-observer repeatability of AIx measurement (MD 0.68, 95% CI -0.24 to 1.59). Measurement of aortic augmentation index using radial applanation tonometry by inexperienced nurses demonstrated very high between-observer repeatability.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: