Key result
A higher disease score from 10 non-invasive tests predicted cardiovascular events, with rates of 1.3, 0.86, and 0.16 per 100 patient-years across highest to lowest tertiles.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of a battery of 10 non-invasive tests of cardiovascular structural and functional health on the future risk of cardiovascular morbid events.
Does a disease score based on 10 non-invasive tests of cardiovascular structural and functional health improve prediction of future cardiovascular morbid events compared to the Framingham risk score in asymptomatic adults?
Cohort (n=1,900)
Does a disease score based on 10 non-invasive tests of cardiovascular structural and functional health improve prediction of future cardiovascular morbid events compared to the Framingham risk score in asymptomatic adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A disease score based on non-invasive tests of cardiovascular structure and function improves risk prediction for future cardiovascular events beyond the Framingham risk score in asymptomatic adults.
AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of a battery of 10 non-invasive tests of cardiovascular structural and functional health on the future risk of cardiovascular morbid events. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1900 asymptomatic adults concerned about their risk for cardiovascular disease underwent non-invasive assessment with 10 tests of vascular and cardiac structure and function. A disease score (DS) was calculated for each individual based on these 10 tests. Follow-up (mean 9.2 years) for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was available for 1442 individuals (mean age 53.2 years, 48.2% women). Those in the lowest DS tertile (0-2) experienced 0.16 cardiovascular events per 100 patient-years (PY), those in the middle tertile (3-5) experienced 0.86 events per 100 PY, and those in the highest tertile (6+) experienced 1.3 events per 100 PY (p < .001). Sensitivity analysis, assuming a neutral effect of DS on projected events in subjects not followed, did not alter statistical significance. Risk assessment using the Framingham risk score (FRS) also predicted morbid events but the two methods differed in identifying individuals at high risk. The net reclassification index was improved by 0.11 (p = 0.01) when DS was added to FRS. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the biological disease process in the arteries and heart of asymptomatic adults provides a guide to the risk of a future cardiovascular morbid event. Larger and longer studies are needed to determine whether risk factor algorithms, the severity of the biological process or some combination is the optimal method for identifying individuals in need of intervention to delay morbid events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duprez et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic adults concerned about cardiovascular disease risk (n=1,900). Disease score (DS) based on 10 non-invasive cardiovascular tests vs. Lowest disease score tertile (0-2) was evaluated on Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (p=<0.001). A higher disease score from 10 non-invasive tests predicted cardiovascular events, with rates of 1.3, 0.86, and 0.16 per 100 patient-years across highest to lowest tertiles.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: