Key result
A history of prior CABG in patients undergoing TAVR was not associated with a significant difference in 2-year overall survival (70% vs 57%, p=0.135) but increased permanent pacemaker implantation.
Why the study?
Does a history of prior CABG affect overall survival or pacemaker implantation rates in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=337)
No
Does a history of prior CABG affect overall survival or pacemaker implantation rates in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 57%
p-value: p=0.135
In patients undergoing TAVR, a history of prior CABG does not reduce overall survival up to 2 years but is associated with a significantly higher risk of requiring a permanent pacemaker.
Prior CABG history signals higher pacemaker risk after TAVR without affecting 2-year survival; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: A history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a common compelling indication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, there is little data on how these patients compare to other TAVR patients. In this study, the short and long-term outcomes of these TAVR patients after CABG are defined. METHODS: A retrospective chart review case-control study of 337 consecutive patients who underwent a TAVR for severe aortic stenosis at Sanford Health in Fargo ND was performed to determine if a history of prior CABG was associated with worse outcomes after TAVR as compared to a TAVR cohort without a history of CABG. RESULTS: Despite higher predicted surgical risk, patients with a history of CABG had no significant difference overall survival at 1 month (98% vs. 93%, P = 0.112), 6 months (94% vs. 87%, P = 0.094), 1 year (85% vs. 77%, P = 0.206) or 2 years (70% vs. 57%, P = 0.135) post-TAVR. However, a history of CABG was associated with an increase in post-TAVR permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (15% vs. 6%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This study gives evidence to suggest that patients with a history of prior CABG do not have any difference in overall survival as other TAVR patients, despite higher predicted surgical risk and differences in preprocedural comorbidities. Our study also confirms the safety of TAVR in this specific population in lower volume centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brent Klinkhammer (2018) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=337). History of prior CABG vs. No history of prior CABG was evaluated on Overall survival at 2 years post-TAVR (p=0.135). A history of prior CABG in patients undergoing TAVR was not associated with a significant difference in 2-year overall survival (70% vs 57%, p=0.135) but increased permanent pacemaker implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: