Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Typically, when ultraviolet and visible absorbance of asphaltenes is employed to measure asphaltene concentration, linear calibrations of absorbance vs. asphaltene concentration are prepared from a sample of asphaltenes in a given solvent. This calibration is shown to be sensitive to: (a) the inorganic solids content of the asphaltenes; (b) physical–chemical differences between asphaltenes from different sources or extracted with different methods; and (c) selective adsorption of asphaltenes on liquid–liquid or solid–liquid interfaces. Calibration constants were determined at wavelengths of 288 and 800 nm for samples of Athabasca and Cold Lake asphaltenes obtained using different extraction methods, from precipitation experiments, and from adsorption experiments on water-in-hydrocarbon emulsions and on powdered metals. It was found that the inorganic solids content did not affect absorbance but the asphaltene concentrations must be corrected to a solids-free basis for accurate results. Calibration constants were found to correlate to the average associated molar masses of the asphaltenes. Therefore, any change in molar mass of asphaltenes during the course of an experiment may change the calibration constant. Partial precipitation and the selective adsorption of asphaltenes can lead to a change in the molar mass of asphaltenes left in solution. The corresponding change in the calibration constants can lead to errors of 5–25% in the estimated concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alboudwarej et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: