PURPOSE: We sought to test the applicability of a well-documented visual function assessment (VF-14) in corneal disease patients wait-listed for penetrating keratoplasty to determine if it would be a valuable addition to a priority scheme. METHODS: A systematic random sample of patients wait-listed for penetrating keratoplasty in British Columbia was selected and administered the VF-14. RESULTS: The mean VF-14 score was 67.2; it was correlated with best corrected vision. Immigrants had lower VF-14 scores and they considered fewer of the questions applicable to them. There was a correlation between the number of questions considered applicable and the VF-14 score. CONCLUSIONS: As currently constituted the VF-14 is probably not a useful tool in a multi-cultural population in North America. We propose revisions to the visual function assessment and suggest its inclusion in a priority scheme for penetrating keratoplasty that also includes pain and other clinical indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courtright et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: