Key result
Computerised cognitive training significantly improved global neurocognitive composite scores compared to an active control in adults with chronic pain (ES 0.43, P=0.017).
Why the study?
Does an 8-week online course of computerised cognitive training improve cognitive performance in adults with chronic pain?
RCT (n=39)
Participant-blinded
randomised
Does an 8-week online course of computerised cognitive training improve cognitive performance in adults with chronic pain?
Effect estimate: ES 0.43
p-value: p=0.017
Supervised cognitive training may be a viable method for enhancing cognitive skills in persons with chronic pain.
Supports computerised cognitive training for cognitive issues in chronic pain; extends intervention evidence to this population.
Chronic pain is associated with reduced efficiency of cognitive performance, and few studies have investigated methods of remediation. We trialled a computerised cognitive training protocol to determine whether it could attenuate cognitive difficulties in a chronic pain sample. Thirty-nine adults with chronic pain (mean age = 43.3, 61.5% females) were randomised to an 8-week online course (3 sessions/week from home) of game-like cognitive training exercises, or an active control involving watching documentary videos. Participants received weekly supervision by video call. Primary outcomes were a global neurocognitive composite (tests of attention, speed, and executive function) and self-reported cognition. Secondary outcomes were pain (intensity; interference), mood symptoms (depression; anxiety), and coping with pain (catastrophising; self-efficacy). Thirty participants (15 training and 15 control) completed the trial. Mixed model intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant effects of training on the global neurocognitive composite (net effect size [ES] = 0.43, P = 0.017), driven by improved executive function performance (attention switching and working memory). The control group reported improvement in pain intensity (net ES = 0.65, P = 0.022). Both groups reported subjective improvements in cognition (ES = 0.28, P = 0.033) and catastrophising (ES = 0.55, P = 0.006). Depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and pain interference showed no change in either group. This study provides preliminary evidence that supervised cognitive training may be a viable method for enhancing cognitive skills in persons with chronic pain, but transfer to functional and clinical outcomes remains to be demonstrated. Active control results suggest that activities perceived as relaxing or enjoyable contribute to improved perception of well-being. Weekly contact was pivotal to successful program completion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in chronic pain (n=39). Computerised cognitive training vs. Active control (watching documentary videos) was evaluated on Global neurocognitive composite (tests of attention, speed, and executive function) and self-reported cognition (ES 0.43, p=0.017). Computerised cognitive training significantly improved global neurocognitive composite scores compared to an active control in adults with chronic pain (ES 0.43, P=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: