Key result
The TK assay provided superior detection of African swine fever virus in tissue samples compared to conventional p72 diagnostic PCR (16.95% vs 8.47%).
Why the study?
African swine fever severely constrains pig production globally, and at least 388 outbreaks were documented in Uganda from 2001 to 2012.
Cross-Sectional
Yes
Multi-locus sequence analysis, particularly the TK assay, provides superior detection and strain diversity estimation for African swine fever virus compared to conventional p72 PCR and serology.
African swine fever (ASF) is a haemorrhagic fever of swine that severely constrains pig production, globally. In Uganda, at least 388 outbreaks of ASF were documented from 2001 to 2012. We undertook a retrospective serological and molecular survey of ASF virus (ASFV) using banked samples collected from seven districts (Pallisa, Lira, Abim, Nebbi, Kabarole, Kibaale, and Mukono) of Uganda. Six assays (ELISA for antibody detection, diagnostic p72 gene PCR and genomic amplification, and sequencing of four gene regions (p72 [P], p54 [A], CVR of the 9RL-ORF [C], and TK [T]), hereinafter referred to as P-A-C-T (PACT)) were evaluated. Antibodies to ASFV were detected in the Abim district (6/25; 24.0%), and the remainder of the serum samples were negative (187/193; 96.9%). For the tissue samples, ASFV detection by assay was 8.47% for P, 6.78% for A, 8.47% for C, and 16.95% for T. The diagnostic PCR (p72 gene) detected seven positive animals from four districts, whereas the TK assay detected ten positives from all seven districts. In addition to the superior detection capability of TK, two virus variants were discernible, whereas CVR recovered three variants, and p72 and p54 sequencing each identified a single variant belonging to genotype IX. Our results indicate that dependence on serology alone underestimates ASF positivity in any infected region, that multi-locus sequence analysis provides better estimates of outbreak strain diversity, and that the TK assay is superior to the WOAH-prescribed conventional p72 diagnostic PCR, and warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kabuuka et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in African swine fever. TK assay and multi-locus sequence analysis (PACT) vs. Conventional p72 diagnostic PCR was evaluated on ASFV detection rate in tissue samples. The TK assay provided superior detection of African swine fever virus in tissue samples compared to conventional p72 diagnostic PCR (16.95% vs 8.47%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: