Key result
Apixaban reduced the cost of treatment and prevention of VTE events 1.8-2.0 times compared with enoxaparin and 1.2-1.4 times compared with dabigatran in large joint replacement.
Why the study?
Do new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran) improve cost-effectiveness compared to enoxaparin for VTE prevention in patients undergoing large joint replacement?
Do new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran) improve cost-effectiveness compared to enoxaparin for VTE prevention in patients undergoing large joint replacement?
Apixaban is the most cost-effective option for VTE prevention after large joint replacement compared to dabigatran and enoxaparin, providing budgetary savings without increasing major bleeding risk.
May inform VTE prophylaxis choices in joint replacement; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Venous thromboembolic (VTE) events are a major concern in large joints replacement leading to patients’ death. The prevention of VTE events suggests the prescription of low molecular weight heparin or oral anticoagulants that differ significantly in their efficacy, safety and cost of the therapy. Aim. To assess the cost-effectiveness of different options for the prevention of VTE events in hip and knee joints replacement. Material and methods. The model, which allows evaluation of the VTE complications incidence in patients aged 60-65years, was developed based on the results of such clinical trials as ADVANCE-2, ADVANCE-3, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE. Analysis was performed on survival period of patients. Weighted average prices of public bidding for the purchase of drugs (enoxaparin, dabigatran and apixaban) during the first quarter of 2015 were the source of the data on the expenses on VTE events prevention. The cost of treatment of VTE events matched for the rate of compulsory health insurance in St. Petersburg for 2015. The costs and life expectancy of patients were discounted at 3.5% per year. Results. The best results for the prevention of VTE events are observed at the treatment regimen with apixsaban. Treatment regimens with dabigatran and enoxaparin were less effective and comparable with each other. At that, the prevalence of major bleedings was similar for all treatment regiments. Apixaban reduced the cost of treatment and prevention of VTE events 1.8-2.0 times as compared with enoxaparin and 1.2-1.4 times in comparison with dabigatran. Conclusion. The new oral anticoagulants are effective and safe alternative to low molecular weight heparins used for the prevention of VTE events in large joints replacement and provide budgetary savings as compared with enoxaparin. Apixaban has a maximum capacity for the reduction of VTE events, lowering the cost of treatment and prevention of VTE events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
А. В. Рудакова (2015) studied Venous thromboembolic events after large joints replacement. Apixaban vs. Enoxaparin and dabigatran was evaluated on Cost of treatment and prevention of VTE events. Apixaban reduced the cost of treatment and prevention of VTE events 1.8-2.0 times compared with enoxaparin and 1.2-1.4 times compared with dabigatran in large joint replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: