Key result
Insertion of the retinal Ca2+-binding domain into the cardiac exchanger conferred K+-dependence to Ca2+ uptake activity with an apparent Km of about 1 mM.
The high affinity Ca2+-binding domain in the main cytosolic loop of the retinal Na+/Ca2+-K+-exchanger mediates its K+ sensitivity.
Demonstrates modular control of NCX K+ sensitivity; leaves open whether this domain alters cardiac Ca2+ handling in vivo.
Two types of Na+/Ca2+-exchangers have been characterized in the literature: The first is the cardiac, skeletal muscle and brain type, which exchanges 1 Ca2+ for 3 Na+, the second, found in retinal photosensor cells, transports 1 Ca2+ and 1 K+ in exchange for 4 Na+. The present work describes the properties of chimeric constructs of the two exchanger types. Ca2+ gel overlay experiments have identified a high affinity (Kd in the 1 microM range) Ca2+-binding domain between Glu601 and Asp733 in the main cytosolic loop of the retinal protein, just after transmembrane domain 5. Insertion of the retinal Ca2+-binding domain in the cytosolic loop of the cardiac exchanger conferred K+-dependence to the Ca2+ uptake activity of the chimeric constructs expressed in HeLa cells. The apparent Km of the K+ effect was about 1 mM. Experiments with C-terminally truncated versions of the retinal insert indicated that the sequence between Leu643 and Asp733 was critical in mediating K+ sensitivity of the recombinant chimeras. Thus, the high affinity Ca2+-binding domain in the main cytosolic loop of the retinal exchanger may regulate the activity of the retinal protein by binding Ca2+, and by conferring to it K+ sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seiler et al. (2000) studied this question. Chimeric constructs of retinal and cardiac Na+/Ca2+-exchangers was evaluated on K+ sensitivity and Ca2+ binding. Insertion of the retinal Ca2+-binding domain into the cardiac exchanger conferred K+-dependence to Ca2+ uptake activity with an apparent Km of about 1 mM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: