Key result
Decortication of the heart (pericardiectomy) was historically developed as a surgical treatment for constrictive pericarditis.
Provides a historical perspective on the surgical treatment of constrictive pericarditis via pericardiectomy.
Historical origins of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis inform surgical context; leaves open modern indications and comparative outcomes.
Delorme,1in 1895, suggested that decortication of the heart should be undertaken much as is decortication of the lung for chronic empyema. Between the years 1895 and 1898, Delorme repeatedly addressed the Clinical Societies of Paris advocating a lysis of the intrapericardial adhesions followed by closure of the pericardium and later recommending actual excision of a portion of the pericardium. The latter operation is the one used today, which is in actuality a pericardiectomy used as the treatment for a constrictive pericarditis. Although the syndrome had been described, it remained for Volhard in 1923 to describe the exact physiology of this constrictive pericarditis and to employ the term inflow stasis. As it stands today, the treatment of constrictive pericarditis usually follows an infective pericarditis, which heals by scar and, often times, calcification; however, as skill in treating traumatic wounds of the chest is gained, the technique should be modified
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H Skinner (1953) conducted a review in Constrictive pericarditis. Decortication of the heart (pericardiectomy) was evaluated. Decortication of the heart (pericardiectomy) was historically developed as a surgical treatment for constrictive pericarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: