Key result
Proposed ECG criteria using an isolated lead with coved-type ECG were more sensitive in detecting SCN5A mutation carriers than conventional criteria without reducing specificity.
Why the study?
Do proposed ECG criteria and SAECG parameters improve the detection of SCN5A mutation carriers in a family with Brugada syndrome compared to conventional criteria?
Observational (n=122)
Do proposed ECG criteria and SAECG parameters improve the detection of SCN5A mutation carriers in a family with Brugada syndrome compared to conventional criteria?
Proposed ECG criteria requiring only a single lead with a coved-type pattern, along with SAECG parameters, are more sensitive than conventional criteria for identifying SCN5A mutation carriers in Brugada syndrome.
May enhance SCN5A carrier detection in Brugada families; leaves open prospective validation before changing practice.
AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a life-threatening arrhythmia disorder associated with autosomal-dominant mutations in the SCN5A gene. We aimed to characterize the diagnostic challenges and clinical manifestations of a novel SCN5A mutation associated with BrS. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a novel SCN5A mutation (c.664C>T; p.Arg222X) identified in a proband with the characteristic electrocardiographic pattern and the history of sudden collapse, 122 family members were studied including 40 carriers of the mutation. The electrocardiographic diagnosis of BrS requires type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern in >1 right precordial lead (V1-V3), but recently an isolated lead with coved-type ECG was proposed to be enough for the diagnosis. In this family, these proposed criteria (PC) were more sensitive in detecting mutation carriers than the conventional criteria without repercussion on the specificity. Carriers had, on average, longer P-wave duration, PR, and QRS intervals and higher transmural dispersion of repolarization. The prevalence of late potentials was higher in carriers, and individual signal average ECG (SAECG) parameters (QRSf, LAS, and RMS40) also were related to SCN5A gene mutation. Three non-carriers were found to be affected by BrS, two with a spontaneous type 1 ECG with alternative placement of the precordial electrodes, and one only after the pharmacological provocative test, suggesting that other genes may play a role in the pathophysiology of this disease. CONCLUSION: The PC for BrS diagnosis should be implemented. Some parameters from the spontaneous ECG and the SAECG are more effective tools than the characteristic repolarization pattern to discriminate between carriers of SCN5A mutations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fugikawa-Santos et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Brugada syndrome (n=122). SCN5A mutation (c.664C>T; p.Arg222X) vs. Non-carriers was evaluated on Detection of mutation carriers and electrocardiographic parameters. Proposed ECG criteria using an isolated lead with coved-type ECG were more sensitive in detecting SCN5A mutation carriers than conventional criteria without reducing specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: