Why the study?
Phenotype heterogeneity among relatives sharing the same SCN5A mutation in Brugada syndrome is poorly understood.
Is the presence of SCN5A mutations associated with the expression of a Brugada syndrome phenotype in large families?
Is the presence of SCN5A mutations associated with the expression of a Brugada syndrome phenotype in large families?
SCN5A mutations are neither necessary nor sufficient to explain the occurrence of the Brugada syndrome phenotype, highlighting significant genotype-phenotype mismatch and incomplete penetrance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SCN5A mutations should not guide Brugada diagnosis alone in families; leaves open modifier gene and polygenic contributions.
Introduction Although SCN5A is the main gene associated with Brs syndrome (Brs), rare variants in this gene only affect 20 to 30 % of patients. Additionally, associated phenotype may differ even among relatives sharing the same mutation emphasizing a phenotype heterogeneity that is poorly understood for now. Objective Here we aim to investigate the association between the presence of SCN5A mutations and the expression of a BrS phenotype in large families. Methods Among Brugada patients enrolled in our prospective cohort, we included patients from families with affected proband carrier of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic SCN5A variant and at least 4 relatives carriers of the same SCN5A mutation. Proband without a spontaneous type 1 ECG and no pharmacological provocative test were excluded. Results A total of 463 individuals from 45 large families were enrolled. Among them, 258 (56%) were mutation carriers of one of the 33 identified SCN5A mutations. After pharmacological test, 219 (47%) individuals were diagnosed with BrS, including 32 not carriers of the familial mutation. Seventy-five patients (30%), carriers of the familial SCN5A mutation, remain negative for Brugada syndrome after pharmacological test. The prevalence of genotype-phenotype mismatch was 24%, including 32 BrS patients non carrier of the familial mutation (phenocopy) and 75 patients with the familial mutation but without BrS (30% of uncomplete penetrance). Conclusion Our data strongly suggest that SCN5A mutation is not either necessary nor sufficient to explain the occurrence of BrS phenotype. We now aim to identify which associated factors might interfere, focusing first on the genetic background of phenotype/genotype mismatched individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Probst et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: