Key result
Novel SCN5A p.Arg1632Cys variant co-segregates with Brugada syndrome in a familial pedigree.
Why the study?
The genetic basis of Brugada syndrome is not well understood, with high phenotypic variability preventing clear genotype-phenotype correlations, and most cases lack a genetic diagnosis.
Case Report (n=8)
No
The R1632C missense variant in the SCN5A gene is likely pathogenic for Brugada syndrome based on segregation in a large consanguineal family.
Supports SCN5A R1632C reclassification in Brugada syndrome families; extends segregation data but leaves pathogenicity confirmation open pending functional studies.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a known cause of sudden cardiac death. The genetic basis of BrS is not well understood, and no one single gene is linked to even a majority of BrS cases. However, mutations in the gene SCN5A are the most common, although the high amount of phenotypic variability prevents a clear correlation between genotype and phenotype. Research techniques are limited, as most BrS cases still remain without a genetic diagnosis, thus impairing the implementation of experimental models representative of a general pathogenetic mechanism. In the present study, we report the largest family to-date with the segregation of the heterozygous variant NM_198056:c.4894C>T (p.Arg1632Cys) in the SCN5A gene. The genotype-phenotype relationship observed suggests a likely pathogenic effect of this variant. Functional studies to better understand the molecular effects of this variant are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monasky et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Brugada syndrome (n=8). SCN5A NM_198056:c.4894C>T (p.Arg1632Cys) variant vs. Family members without the variant was evaluated on Genotype-phenotype co-segregation. The heterozygous SCN5A NM_198056:c.4894C>T (p.Arg1632Cys) variant co-segregated with the Brugada syndrome phenotype in a consanguineous family, suggesting a likely pathogenic effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: